OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS.

@article{Oskamp1965OVERCONFIDENCEIC,
  title={OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS.},
  author={Stuart Oskamp},
  journal={Journal of consulting psychology},
  year={1965},
  volume={29},
  pages={
          261-5
        }
}
  • S. Oskamp
  • Published 1 June 1965
  • Psychology
  • Journal of consulting psychology
It is a common phenomenon of clinical practice that as a psychologist accumulates casestudy material about another human being, he comes to think that he knows that person pretty well. Consequently, sooner or later in the information-gathering process, the psychologist becomes confident enough to make diagnostic conclusions, describe the client's main dynamics, and perhaps even venture to predict his future behavior. Though the psychologist's conclusions may remain tentative, his increase in… 

Tables from this paper

Confidence in Personality Assessment

The results of two studies suggest that more experienced clinicians report a greater degree of confidence and levels of confidence which match more closely their level of accuracy than do inexperienced clinicians, and that clinicians tend to be overconfident in making judgments about case studies.

Cognitive Optimism: Self-Deception or Memory-Based Processing Heuristics?

  • J. Metcalfe
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 1998
In a wide variety of cognitive tasks, people's expectations of what their own performance is, was, and will be are an overestimate of reality, and it is suggested that in these situations, the optimistic bias is not attributable exclusively to self-deception or wishful thinking.

Intuitive Data Processing as a Potential Source of Bias in Naturalistic Evaluations

in the 17th century, for example, rebelled against the influence of Aristotelian thinking and the methods of acquiring knowledge (especially about the physical universe) current in his own day. In

Evidence of Data and Confidence in Clinical Judgments

The literature about research on people's confidence in their general knowledge has usually reported an overconfidence effect (mean subjective probability is higher than percentage of correct

Mental contamination and the debiasing problem.

People do not have access to or control over the recipe of their impressions, feelings, and attitudes. There exists a vast, adaptive unconscious that does much of the work of sizing up and evaluating

ATTITUDES AND SOCIAL COGNITION On the Genesis of Confidence

Confidence in personality impressions is proposed to stem from the richness of people's mental representations of others. Representational richness produces confidence because it enhances the fluency

An Alternative Paradigm for Studying the Accuracy of Person Perception: Simulated Personalities

This chapter examines the prospects of the contemporary reprise of person perception accuracy. I identify three components of a paradigm for studying accuracy: a model of social judgment, a model of

Confiance Excessive: Connaissances et Croyances

Abstract It had already been found (Lamarche 1988; Oskamp 1965) that the overconfidence shown in answering a question increased with the number of new informations given. The objective of our

Flawed Self-Assessment

  • D. DunningC. HeathJ. Suls
  • Psychology
    Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society
  • 2004
Empirical findings on the imperfect nature of self-assessment are reviewed and several interventions aimed at circumventing the consequences of such flawed assessments are discussed; these include training people to routinely make cognitive repairs correcting for biasedSelf-assessments and requiring people to justify their decisions in front of their peers.

Effects of Training on Confidence in Clinical Judgments

  • N. Abston
  • Psychology
    Perceptual and motor skills
  • 1982
It is concluded that college training in psychology has little effect on confidence in clinical judgments; one possible explanation might be that neither graduate nor undergraduate srudents actively utilize their training when makingclinical judgments; instead they base their judgments on first impressions and intuition.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES

When shall we use our heads instead of the formula

My title question, "When should we use our heads instead of the formula?" is not rhetorical. I am sincerely asking what I see as an important question. I find the two extreme answers to this

Lives in progress : a study of the natural growth of personality

M. BREWSTER SMITH is professor emeritus of psychology at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Among other publications, he is author of Values, Self, and Society: Toward a Humanist Social

Experimental Design in Psychological Research.

Experimental Design in Psychological Research , Experimental Design in Psychological Research , کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران

The clinician as judge: implications of a series of studies.

  • R. Hamlin
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Journal of consulting psychology
  • 1954

A method for the empirical study of psychodiagnosis.

  • A. Kostlán
  • Psychology
    Journal of consulting psychology
  • 1954

The ability to judge people.

  • R. Taft
  • Education
    Psychological bulletin
  • 1955