ON THE LOGICAL UNSOLVABILITY OF THE GETTIER PROBLEM

@article{Floridi2004ONTL,
  title={ON THE LOGICAL UNSOLVABILITY OF THE GETTIER PROBLEM},
  author={L. Floridi},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={142},
  pages={61-79}
}
  • L. Floridi
  • Published 1 October 2004
  • Philosophy
  • Synthese
The tripartite account of propositional, fallibilist knowledge that p as justified true belief can become adequate only if it can solve the Gettier Problem. However, the latter can be solved only if the problem of a successful coordination of the resources (at least truth and justification) necessary and sufficient to deliver propositional, fallibilist knowledge that p can be solved. In this paper, the coordination problem is proved to be insolvable by showing that it is equivalent to the… 
Knowledge and the Gettier Problem
Edmund Gettier's 1963 verdict about what knowledge is not has become an item of philosophical orthodoxy, accepted by philosophers as a genuine epistemological result. It assures us that - contrary to
Tolerance Towards Gettier-type Counterexamples
  • W. Yang, Yin-dan Wang
  • Philosophy
    DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science
  • 2019
Although the JTB account for knowledge is challenged by Gettier-type counterexamples, we could still grasp the concept of knowledge by means of it. After thinking some modifications and
Information closure and the sceptical objection
TLDR
It is argued that the sceptical objection against pic fails, so such an objection provides no ground to abandon the normal modal logic B as a formalization of “S is informed that $$p$$p”, which remains plausible insofar as this specific obstacle is concerned.
Information Closure and the Sceptical Objection Faculty of Philosophy And
In this article, I define and then defend the principle of information closure (PIC) against a sceptical objection similar to the one discussed by Dretske in relation to the principle of epistemic
Manifest Failure Failure: The Gettier Problem Revived
If the history of the Gettier Problem has taught us anything, it is to be skeptical regarding purported solutions. Nevertheless, in “Manifest Failure: The Gettier Problem Solved” (2011), that is
Putting the horse before the cart: a pragmatist analysis of knowledge
The definition of knowledge as justified true belief is the best we presently have. However, the canonical tripartite analysis of knowledge does not do justice to it due to a Platonic conception of a
THE LOGIC OF BEING INFORMED
TLDR
The problem is solved by arguing that the axiom schemata of the normal modal logic KTB are well suited to formalise the relation of ia is informed that pi satisfactorily and four consequences of a KTB-based IL are explored.
Uma solução não convencional para o problema de Gettier
The Gettier Problem (henceforth GP) is a milestone in contemporary epistemology. Half a century after the philosophical earthquake caused by the well-known Gettier article (1963), solutions continue
How to Do Philosophy Informationally
TLDR
Three methods to approach philosophical problems informationally: Minimalism, the Method of Abstraction and Constructionism are introduced, and an application: the problem of visual perception, functionalism, and the Turing Test is provided.
And so on: two theories of regress arguments in philosophy
This PhD dissertation is on infinite regress arguments in philosophy. Its main goals are to explain what such arguments from many distinct philosophical debates have in common, and to provide
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 39 REFERENCES
The Inescapability of Gettier Problems
This chapter argues that any definition of knowledge as true belief + x will be subject to Gettier-style counterexamples as long as the connection between x (justification, reliability, proper
Does the Gettier Problem Rest on a Mistake
Attempts to resolve the Gettier Problem1 rest on the mistaken assumption that an analysis of knowledge can be found which is (a) generous enough to include as items of knowledge all, or most, of
Warrant and Analysis
1. Epistemologists have expended a great deal of energy over the last three decades attempting to produce correct analyses of two central epistemological concepts: knowledge and justified belief. At
Reasoning about knowledge
TLDR
Reasoning About Knowledge is the first book to provide a general discussion of approaches to reasoning about knowledge and its applications to distributed systems, artificial intelligence, and game theory.
Scepticism and the foundation of epistemology
Can knowledge provide its own justification? This sceptical challenge - known as the problem of the criterion - is one of the major issues in the history of epistemology, and this volume provides its
Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of
A Theory of Knowledge
THE distinguished author of “Why the Mind has a Body” is one of the most original and fearless philosophers of the school which labels itself “Critical Realism.” The present short volume, though it
Warrant and proper function
Professor Plantinga is known for distinguished work in the fields of epistemology and philosophy of religion. In this companion volume to Warrant: The Current Debate, Plantinga develops an original
Knowledge, probability, and adversaries
TLDR
It is shown how different assignments of probability spaces (corresponding to different opponents) yield different levels of guarantees in probabilistic coordinated attack.
Reaching Agreement in the Presence of Faults
TLDR
It is shown that the problem is solvable for, and only for, n ≥ 3m + 1, where m is the number of faulty processors and n is the total number and this weaker assumption can be approximated in practice using cryptographic methods.
...
...