Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data.

Abstract

CONTEXT Although the ability to work with numbers is important to the practice of medicine, little is known about physician numeracy (basic skill with numbers). OBJECTIVE To test medical students' numeracy and how it relates to the ability to interpret risk-reduction information. DESIGN Randomized, cross-sectional survey. SAMPLE 62 first-year medical students at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill medical school who attended a risk-communication seminar and had usable survey data (46% of the 134 students who received the survey). INTERVENTION Students were given information about the baseline risk for developing a hypothetical disease and were randomly assigned to one of four risk-reduction presentations-relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat (NNT), or a combination of these three formats-about how two drugs would reduce this risk. OUTCOME MEASURES Number of correct answers to three numeracy questions (stating that 500 heads would be expected in 1000 coin flips; converting "1% of 1000" to 10; and converting "1 in 1,000" to 0.1%). Correct data interpretation was judged with two tasks: a comparative task (i.e., state which drug provides greater benefit) and a quantitative task (i.e., calculate how much one of the drugs reduces disease risk). RESULTS 77% of students answered all three numeracy questions correctly; 18% answered two correctly; and 5% answered one or none correctly. While 90% correctly stated which drug worked better, only 61% accurately interpreted the quantitative data. The ability to interpret data varied with numeracy: 71% of students who answered all three numeracy questions correctly also accurately interpreted the quantitative data, compared with 36% who answered two questions correctly and 0% who answered one or no questions correctly (P < 0.01). Correct quantitative interpretation was lower with the NNT format than with the other three formats (25% vs. 75%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Almost one quarter of first-year medical students in our study had trouble performing basic numerical tasks. Those who had trouble also seemed to have difficulty interpreting medical data. This difficulty seemed to be exacerbated by presenting data in the NNT format.

4 Figures and Tables

0204060'04'06'08'10'12'14'16
Citations per Year

235 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 235 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Sheridan2002NumeracyAT, title={Numeracy and the medical student's ability to interpret data.}, author={Stacey L. Sheridan and Michael P Pignone}, journal={Effective clinical practice : ECP}, year={2002}, volume={5 1}, pages={35-40} }