Corpus ID: 152299928

Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe

@inproceedings{Allison2004NuclearTT,
  title={Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe},
  author={G. Allison},
  year={2004}
}
A call to action on the threat of nuclear terrorism predicts that a catastrophic attack is likely to occur within the next decade if policy makers continue present tactics, and states that such an attack is preventable, offering recommendations for addressing national vulnerabilities. 40,000 first p 
Denying Armageddon: Preventing Terrorist Use of Nuclear Weapons
The United States can significantly reduce the likelihood of a nuclear terrorist attack if it pursues a vigorous, multilayered approach. Such an approach involves controlling nuclear technology andExpand
Nuclear Terrorism: Assessing the Danger
Abstract This article attempts to make a realistic assessment of the danger of nuclear terrorism. While acknowledging the catastrophic consequences of an act of terrorism employing either anExpand
Averting Nuclear Catastrophe: Contemplating Extreme Responses to U.S. Vulnerability
Traditional deterrence is not an effective approach toward terrorist groups bent on causing a nuclear catastrophe. Preventive strategies, which call for the elimination of an enemy before it is ableExpand
The United States dealings with nuclear terrorism: cooperation from prevention
Security experts agree that although unlikely, a nuclear terrorist attack is possible. Concerted efforts are needed in order to secure nuclear materials and nuclear weapons around the globe,Expand
A Nuclear Response to Nuclear Terror: Ref lections of Nuclear Preemption
The threat of nuclear terrorism in the United States has led its leadership to contemplate an extreme military response—namely, nuclear preemption. To some preemption proponents, nuclear weapons areExpand
The 9/11 Effect: Comparative Counter-Terrorism
1. Introduction 2. The United Nations responds 3. Countries that did not immediately respond 4. The United States responds: executive power and extra-legalism 5. The United Kingdom responds: aExpand
Nuclear Power and Antiterrorism: Obscuring the Policy Contradictions 1
Abstract Some governments are promoting both nuclear power and antiterrorism, but without much attention to connections between the two issues. Nuclear power increases the risk of nuclear terrorismExpand
Missile Defenses in a “Deuces Wild” Context: Proliferation, Terror and Deterrent Disorder
Optimists hoped that the end of the Cold War and the dawn of the twenty-first century would see the marginalization of nuclear weapons as instruments of mass destruction and political coercion. AfterExpand
Nuclear Terrorism: Calibrating Funding for Defensive Programs in Response to the Threat
Abstract : The risk of a nuclear attack by terrorists is one of the most urgent and threatening dangers facing the U.S. The U.S. National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction depicts aExpand
Nuclear Power and Antiterrorism: Obscuring the Policy Contradictions1
Some governments are promoting both nuclear power and antiterrorism, but without much attention to connections between the two issues. Nuclear power increases the risk of nuclear terrorism directlyExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...