# Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages

@article{Mcnemar1947NoteOT, title={Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages}, author={Quinn Mcnemar}, journal={Psychometrika}, year={1947}, volume={12}, pages={153-157} }

Two formulas are presented for judging the significance of the difference between correlated proportions. The chi square equivalent of one of the developed formulas is pointed out.

## 3,272 Citations

### Note on the “correction for continuity” in testing the significance of the difference between correlated proportions

- GeologyPsychometrika
- 1948

Methods of correcting for continuity in tests of significance of the difference between correlated proportions are presented to increase the range of usefulness of the formulas developed by McNemar.

### Note on interval estimation of the difference between proportions from correlated series.

- MathematicsStatistics in medicine
- 1985

A procedure for estimating the confidence interval of the difference between proportions in paired observations using a variance estimator obtained at the limit and not conditional on the number of discordant pairs is presented.

### Testing equality of correlated proportions with incomplete data on both responses

- Mathematics
- 1986

Two test statistics are proposed for testing the equality of two correlated proportions when some observations are missing on both responses. The performance of these tests in terms of size and power…

### Number of observations required for the comparison of two correlated proportions

- Mathematics
- 1980

Previous sample size tables for studies with pairwise matching of experimental units and all-or-none responses have relied upon asymptotic results for the power function given the effective sample…

### A Survey of Sign Tests Based on the Binomial Distribution

- Mathematics, Geology
- 1969

A detailed discussion of the classical sign test is given. Assumptions and conditions of use are described and illustrated for fixed sample sizes. The relationship of this to other (frequently, but…

### A hybrid paired and unpaired analysis for the comparison of proportions.

- PsychologyStatistics in medicine
- 1995

The method will simplify to the usual cases of two independent samples or paired samples (McNemar's method) depending on whether there is no or complete overlap.

### On testing the equality of proportions in the paired case with incomplete data

- Mathematics
- 1982

The problem of testing two correlated proportions with incomplete data is considered by means of Monte Carlo simulations studies. A test proposed in this paper, which can be regarded as a…

### An Alternative Measure of Effect Size for Cochran's Q Test for Related Proportions

- PsychologyPerceptual and motor skills
- 2007

A chance-corrected measure of effect size is introduced for Cochran's Q test for psychological research.

### Formulas and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the matched pair design: a review

- MathematicsFundamental & clinical pharmacology
- 1996

Summary— This paper is a compendium of exact and asymptotic formulas and tables for calculating the sample size in a clinical trial for a matched‐pair design involving a dichotomous outcome. Formulas…