Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions

  title={Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions},
  author={Jonathan M. Weinberg and Shaun Nichols and Stephen G. W. Stich},
  journal={Philosophical Topics},
In this paper we propose to argue for two claims. The first is that a sizeable group of epistemological projects – a group which includes much of what has been done in epistemology in the analytic tradition – would be seriously undermined if one or more of a cluster of empirical hypotheses about epistemic intuitions turns out to be true. The basis for this claim will be set out in Section 2. The second claim is that, while the jury is still out, there is now a substantial body of evidence… 
The Epistemology of Intuition and Seemings
Rationalism is the view that intuitions are a defeasible source of noninferential justification. The first part of this dissertation is an exposition and defense of this view. I begin with an account
The purpose of this dissertation is to defend the position known in epistemic literature as epistemic externalism. This position essentially consists in the thesis that some of the features which
Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions?
Intuitions play an important role in contemporary epistemology. Over the last decade, however, experimental philosophers have published a number of studies suggesting that epistemic intuitions may
Intuitions and relativity
I address a criticism of the use of thought experiments in conceptual analysis advanced on the basis of the survey method of so-called experimental philosophy. The criticism holds that surveys show
Reply to Sosa
  • Philosophy
1 Sosa's topic is the use of intuitions in philosophy. Much of what I have written on the issue has been critical of appeals to intuition in epistemology, though in recent years I have become
The cognitive source of philosophical intuitions: Troubles for the etiological project
The advent of experimental philosophy has generated a renewed interest in the nature of philosophical intuitions. This has led many to assume that understanding the psychological processes that
Rationalism and the Content of Intuitive Judgements
It is commonly held that our intuitive judgements about imaginary problem cases are justified a priori, if and when they are justified at all. In this paper I defend this view — ‘rationalism’ —
Why Intuition?
Recent debates over philosophical methodology have overwhelmingly focused on the epistemological merits of a type of mental state called 'intuition'. Philosophers on both sides have tended to write
Philosophical Expertise
Recent work in experimental philosophy has indicated that intuitions may be subject to several forms of bias, thereby casting doubt on the viability of intuition as an evidential source in
The role of intuition
Since its inception, experimental philosophy has been bound up with methodological questions regarding the status of intuition. Several of the most well-known early experimental studies attracted


Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?
  • L. Cohen
  • Psychology
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 1981
Abstract The object of this paper is to show why recent research in the psychology of deductive and probabilistic reasoning does not have "bleak implications for human rationality," as has sometimes
A Theory of the A Priori
Good evidence is clearly required for the sort of knowledge sought in science, logic, mathematics, and philosophy. This suggests the idea of approaching the a priori through the topic of "evidence"
Without good reason : the rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science
Are humans rational? Various experiments performed over the last several decades have been interpreted as showing that humans are irrational-we make significant and consistent errors in logical
A Theory of Knowledge
THE distinguished author of “Why the Mind has a Body” is one of the most original and fearless philosophers of the school which labels itself “Critical Realism.” The present short volume, though it
Epistemic folkways and scientific epistemology
What is the mission of epistemology, and what is its proper methodology? Such meta-epistemological questions have been prominent in recent years, especially with the emergence ofvarious brands of
Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes About Human Rationality Disappear
During the last 25 years, researchers studying human reasoning and judgment in what has become known as the “heuristics and biases” tradition have produced an impressive body of experimental work
Warrant and proper function
Professor Plantinga is known for distinguished work in the fields of epistemology and philosophy of religion. In this companion volume to Warrant: The Current Debate, Plantinga develops an original
Knowledge and justification
This chapter offers a way out for the externalist virtue epistemologist, with implications for the perennial problematic of radical skepticism. Consisting of three parts, the chapter outlines some
Running Head: CULTURE AND THOUGHT Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic vs. Analytic Cognition
We propose a theory of how systems of thought arise on the basis of differing cultural practices and argue that the theory accounts for substantial differences in East Asian and Western thought
Naturalism and normativity
McNaughton and Rawling's anti-reductionist intentions are to be welcomed, but are not well served by their continuing adherence to a neo-Humean notion of the 'descriptive'. Their too-willing