Norm Enforcement : Anger , Indignation or Reciprocity ?

@inproceedings{Carpenter2005NormE,
  title={Norm Enforcement : Anger , Indignation or Reciprocity ?},
  author={Jeffrey Paul Carpenter and Peter Hans Matthews},
  year={2005}
}
The enforcement of social norms often requires that unaffected third parties sanction offenders. Given the renewed interest of economists in norms, the literature on third party punishment is surprisingly thin. In this paper, we report the results of an experiment designed to replicate the anger-based punishment of directly affected second parties and evaluate two distinct explanations for third party punishment, indignation and group reciprocity. We find evidence in favor of both, with the… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 40 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 32 references

Can SecondOrder Punishment Deter Perverse Punishment?

  • Cinyabuguma, Matthias, Tablot Page, Louis Putterman
  • Experimental Economics,
  • 2006
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Punishing Free-Riders: How Group Size Affects SPP and the Provision of Public Goods.

  • Carpenter, Jeffrey
  • Games and Economic Behavior,
  • 2007

Theories of Commitment, Altruism and Reciprocity.

  • Croson, Rachel
  • Economic Inquiry,
  • 2007

Norms of Cooperation among Urban and Rural Dwellers: Experimental Evidence from Russia.

  • Gächter, Simon, Benedikt Herrmann
  • 2005

Rewards and Sanctions and the Provision of Public Goods in One-Shot Settings.

  • Walker, James, Matthew Halloran
  • Experimental Economics,
  • 2004

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…