Norm Conflict in International Law: Whither Human Rights?

@article{Milanovi2009NormCI,
  title={Norm Conflict in International Law: Whither Human Rights?},
  author={Marko Milanovi{\'c}},
  journal={LSN: Other Issues in International Law (Topic)},
  year={2009}
}
  • M. Milanović
  • Published 2 April 2009
  • Political Science, Law
  • LSN: Other Issues in International Law (Topic)
The article examines norm conflicts, defined as situations where one norm constitutes, has led to, or may lead to a breach of another, and particularly those norm conflicts in which one of the conflicting norms is a rule of human rights law. Such instances occur more and more every day, are increasingly litigated, and can be of great political importance. For example, a human rights treaty might prohibit the preventative detention or internment of persons under any circumstances, while the UN… 
Challenges and Opportunities for Judicial Protection of Human Rights against Decisions of the United Nations Security Council
The thesis deals with the responses of domestic and regional courts when they are confronted with cases concerning individuals whose human rights are interfered with due to the implementation of UNSC
Approaches to Resolving Growing Conflicts between Human Rights and International Law Norms in British and European Courts
This paper examines, in detail, the operation of Article 103 of the UN Charter, including in regards to, "ius cogens." It analyses the position of the Security Council in relation to the rule of law,
Identifying Conflicts of Norms: The ICJ Approach in the Case of the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening)
Abstract The potential for conflicts of norms is particularly great in modern international law. Yet until now, the International Court of Justice has said very little as to what it considers a
2012, , (With (Great) Power Comes (Great) Responsibility: A Move Toward Greater Responsibility for States Exercising Power Abroad.)
This case note addresses the recent European Court of Human Rights case Al-Jedda v the United Kingdom. In this case, the Court decided that the act of detaining and interning the applicant in Iraq
Non-Refoulement Obligations in Public International Law: Towards a New Protection Status?
Where do non-refoulement obligations come from, and what is their status, scope and content under international law? This chapter seeks to answer these questions in two ways. For the most part, it
Freezing of Assets as a Counter-Terrorism Measure in the EU After Al-Aqsa Judgment of the Court of Justice
The judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (“the CJEU”) in the Al-Aqsa case is yet another ruling where the CJEU examines the measures of EU secondary law providing for the freezing of assets of
The shared protection of human rights at the International Criminal Court
This thesis analyses the situations in which human rights protection is shared between the ICC and its States Parties. In particular, it looks at the obligations of the ICC and States to protect the
Entrenching peace in law: do peace agreements possess international legal status?
Some 650 peace agreements have been concluded between governments and armed opposition groups since 1990. These agreements often do not fulfil the criteria of sources in domestic or international
NORM CONFLICT BETWEEN WTO COVERED AGREEMENTS—REAL, APPARENT OR AVOIDED?
  • C. Chase
  • Political Science, Economics
    International and Comparative Law Quarterly
  • 2012
Abstract This article explores the issue of norm conflict in the context of specific multilateral agreements that are administered and enforced by the World Trade Organization (WTO), namely, the
Inherent hinders in International Law – a case study of obstacles for coherent human rights protection in Europe
This thesis deals with the inherent hinders in international law, which are obstacles to a coherent human rights protection in Europe. By looking at cases from the European Court of Justice and the
...
...