Nonnegative trigonometric polynomials and a zero-free region for the Riemann zeta-function

@article{Mossinghoff2014NonnegativeTP,
  title={Nonnegative trigonometric polynomials and a zero-free region for the Riemann zeta-function},
  author={Michael J. Mossinghoff and Tim Trudgian},
  journal={Journal of Number Theory},
  year={2014},
  volume={157},
  pages={329-349}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Explicit bounds on the logarithmic derivative and the reciprocal of the Riemann zeta-function
: The purpose of this article is consider | ζ (cid:48) ( σ + it ) /ζ ( σ + it ) | and | ζ ( σ + it ) | − 1 when σ is close to unity. We prove that | ζ (cid:48) ( σ + it ) /ζ ( σ + it ) | (cid:54)
EXPLICIT ZERO‐FREE REGIONS FOR DIRICHLET ‐FUNCTIONS
Let L(s, χ) be the Dirichlet L-function associated to a non-principal primitive character χ modulo q with 3 ≤ q ≤ 400 000. We prove a new explicit zero-free region for L(s, χ): L(s, χ) does not
Explicit estimates of some functions over primes
New results have been found about the Riemann hypothesis. In particular, we noticed an extension of zero-free region and a more accurate location of zeros in the critical strip. The Riemann
Density results for the zeros of zeta applied to the error term in the prime number theorem
. We improve the unconditional explicit bounds for the error term in the prime counting function ψ ( x ). In particular, we prove that, for all x > 2, we have | ψ ( x ) − x | < 9 . 22106 x (log x ) 3
Some explicit estimates for the error term in the prime number theorem
. By combining and improving recent techniques and results, we provide explicit estimates for the error terms | π ( x ) − li( x ) | , | θ ( x ) − x | and | ψ ( x ) − x | appearing in the prime number
Prime Numbers in Short Intervals
The Riemann zeta function, ζ(s), is central to number theory and our understanding of the distribution of the prime numbers. This thesis presents some of the known results in this area before
Explicit interval estimates for prime numbers
Using a smoothing function and recent knowledge on the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function, we compute pairs of $(\Delta, x_0)$ such that for all $x \geq x_0$ there exists at least one prime in the
Explicit lower bounds on $|L(1, \chi)|$
Let χ denote a primitive, non-quadratic Dirichlet character with conductor q, and let L(s, χ) denote its associated Dirichlet L-function. We show that |L(1, χ)| ≥ 1/(9.12255 log(q/π)) for
Sharper bounds for the error term in the Prime Number Theorem
TLDR
This work proves that it is proved that π ( x) − Li ( x ) | ≤ 9 .
An elementary bound on Siegel zeroes
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 27 REFERENCES
Zero-free regions for the Riemann zeta function
We improve existing explicit bounds of Vinogradov-Korobov type for zero-free regions of the Riemann zeta function, both for large height t and for every t. A primary input is an explicit bound of the
A NOTE ON KADIRI'S EXPLICIT ZERO FREE REGION FOR RIEMANN ZETA FUNCTION
Abstract. In 2005 Kadiri proved that the Riemann zeta function ζ(s)does not vanish in the regionRe(s) ≥ 1 −1R 0 log|Im(s)|, |Im(s)| ≥ 2with R 0 = 5.69693. In this paper we will show that R 0 can be
Sharper bounds for the Chebyshev functions $\theta (x)$ and $\psi (x)$
Abstract : The authors demonstrate a wider zero-free region for the Riemann zeta function than has been given before. They give improved methods for using this and a recent determination that
Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function
In this paper, we present a proof of the Riemann hypothesis. We show that zeros of the Riemann zeta function should be on the line with the real value 1/2, in the region where the real part of
New bounds for π(x)
TLDR
The proof relies on two new arguments: smoothing the prime counting function which allows to generalize the previous approaches, and a new explicit zero density estimate for the zeros of the Riemann zeta function.
Some extremal properties of positive trigonometric polynomials
AbstractFor n=8 an upper bound is given for the functional $$V_n = \mathop {\inf }\limits_{t_n } \frac{{\alpha _1 + \alpha _2 + \cdots + \alpha _n }}{{\left( {\sqrt {\alpha _1 } - \sqrt {\alpha _0 }
Explicit estimates for the summatory function of Λ(n)/n from the one of Λ(n)
We prove that the error term $\sum_{n\le x} \Lambda(n)/n − \log x + \gamma$ differs from $(\psi(x) − x)/x$ by a well controlled function. We deduce very precise numerical results from this formula.
Updating the error term in the prime number theorem
An improved estimate is given for $$|\theta (x) -x|$$|θ(x)-x|, where $$\theta (x) = \sum _{p\le x} \log p$$θ(x)=∑p≤xlogp. Four applications are given: the first to arithmetic progressions that have
New bounds for $\psi(x)$
In this article we provide new explicit Chebyshev's bounds for the prime counting function $\psi(x)$. The proof relies on two new arguments: smoothing the prime counting function which allows to
A still sharper region where π(x)-li(x) is positive
TLDR
A stronger version of Lehman’s theorem involving a different weight function is derived, which enables us to certify the preceding candidate region and improve this region by appealing to a combination of theoretical results and numerical computation.
...
...