Nonemergency PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.

@article{Jacobs2013NonemergencyPA,
  title={Nonemergency PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.},
  author={Alice K. Jacobs and Sharon-Lise T. Normand and Joseph M. Massaro and Donald E. Cutlip and Joseph P. Carrozza and Anthony D Marks and Nancy Murphy and Iyah K. Romm and Madeleine Biondolillo and Laura Mauri},
  journal={The New England journal of medicine},
  year={2013},
  volume={368 16},
  pages={
          1498-508
        }
}
BACKGROUND Emergency surgery has become a rare event after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether having cardiac-surgery services available on-site is essential for ensuring the best possible outcomes during and after PCI remains uncertain. METHODS We enrolled patients with indications for nonemergency PCI who presented at hospitals in Massachusetts without on-site cardiac surgery and randomly assigned these patients, in a 3:1 ratio, to undergo PCI at that hospital or at a partner… 
PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.
TLDR
The findings of the Randomized Trial to Compare Percutaneous Coronary Intervention between Massachusetts Hospitals with Cardiac Surgery On-Site and Community Hospitals without Cardiac surgery on-Site found that nonemergency percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed at hospitals without on-site surgery were noninferior to procedures performed by operators in hospitals with on- site surgery.
Percutaneous coronary intervention without surgery on‐site is here to stay
TLDR
It is concluded that PCI without surgery on-site is safe for selected patients when performed in experienced hands in dedicated centres, and the minimum number of procedures per centre and per operator are required in order to ensure proficiency, experience and continued quality of care.
Percutaneous coronary intervention without surgery on‐site is here to stay
TLDR
Reports using non-randomised data from the NRMI database by Pride et al., which included 58,821 STEMI patients and more than 100,000 NSTEMI patients treated either in centres with or without surgery on-site confirmed that the safety and efficacy of such PCI procedures was similar.
Yes, We Can! (Should We?).
TLDR
This report demonstrates that the incidence of other PCI-related complications, including myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiogenic shock, aortic dissection, and tamponade, as well as early and late all-cause mortality, is not different at hospitals with and without colocated cardiac surgery.
Outcomes and Temporal Trends of Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Centers With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery in the United States
TLDR
The data provide evidence that PCI at centers without on-site cardiac surgery may be safe in the modern era, and there were no significant differences in the risk-adjusted, in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups in prespecified subgroups after adjusting for multiple comparisons.
Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Performed at Offsite Versus Onsite Surgical Centers in the United Kingdom.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Centers With and Without On-Site Surgical Backup: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies
TLDR
Cumulative meta-analysis of nonprimary PCI showed a temporal decrease of the effect size (OR) for all-cause mortality after 2007, and Temporal trends indicated improving clinical outcomes in non primary PCI at centers without on-site surgery.
Patient access and 1-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention facilities with and without on-site cardiothoracic surgery: insights from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) program.
TLDR
This study suggests that providing PCI facilities without on-site CT surgery in an integrated health care system with quality oversight improves patient access without compromising procedural or 1-year outcomes.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
Outcomes of PCI at hospitals with or without on-site cardiac surgery.
TLDR
It was found that PCI performed at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery was noninferior to PCI performed in hospitals with on- site cardiac surgery with respect to mortality at 6 weeks and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months.
Outcomes for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Hospitals With and Without Onsite Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: The New York State Experience
TLDR
No differences between P-PCI centers and full service centers were found in in-hospital/30-day mortality, the need for emergency surgery, 3-year mortality or subsequent revascularization, but P- PCI centers had higher repeat target vessel PCI rates and higher mortality rates for patients who did not undergo PCI.
Thrombolytic therapy vs primary percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction in patients presenting to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
TLDR
Compared with thrombolytic therapy, treatment of patients with primary PCI at hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery is associated with better clinical outcomes for 6 months after index MI and a shorter hospital stay.
Percutaneous coronary intervention at centers with and without on-site surgery: a meta-analysis.
TLDR
Percutaneous coronary interventions performed at centers without on- site surgery, compared with centers with on-site surgery, were not associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality or emergency bypass surgery.
Outcomes Among Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Presenting to Interventional Hospitals With and Without On-Site Cardiac Surgery
TLDR
STEMI patients presenting to No-OHS hospitals have substantially higher mortality, are less likely to receive guideline recommended medications within 24 hours, and are more likely to undergo acute reperfusion therapy, although this difference was of borderline significance after adjusting for hospital and treatment variables.
...
1
2
3
...