Non-Refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence

  title={Non-Refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence},
  author={James C. Hathaway and Thomas Gammeltoft‐Hansen},
  journal={Columbia Journal of Transnational Law},
Developed states have what might charitably be called a schizophrenic attitude towards international refugee law. Determined to remain formally engaged with refugee law and yet unwavering in their commitment to avoid assuming their fair share of practical responsibilities under that regime, wealthier countries have embraced the politics of non-entree, comprising efforts to keep refugees away from their territories but without formally resiling from treaty obligations. As the early generation of… 
The End of the Deterrence Paradigm? Future Directions for Global Refugee Policy
Asylum seekers and refugees continue to face serious obstacles in their efforts to access asylum. Some of these obstacles are inherent to irregular migration, including dangerous border crossings and
Cooperation-Based Non-Entrèe. What Prospects for Legal Accountability?
In a bid to avoid the financial and political cost of processing growing numbers of asylum applications from ‘irregular’ migrants, European States have resorted to an array of different ‘practices of
Abstract While countries that receive refugees have certain legal obligations to assist and protect them, the legal duties of other States to step in and help relieve this burden is less clear.
Non-refoulement as Custom and Jus Cogens ? Putting the Prohibition to the Test
The norm of non-refoulement is at the heart of the international protection of refugees yet there remains a lack of consensus as to its status. In this contribution, we examine the question whether
The Right to Perform Rescue at Sea: Jurisprudence and Drowning
Abstract Framing largescale migrant drownings as violations of international law has so far not been a straightforward task. The failures of doing so, both in scholarship and in activism, have often
Offshoring the Border: The 1981 United States–Haiti Agreement and the Origins of Extraterritorial Maritime Interdiction
  • K. Tennis
  • History
    Journal of Refugee Studies
  • 2019
Extraterritorial maritime interdiction is a common tactic used by destination states to keep unwanted migrants from reaching their borders. But it is problematic, raising legal concerns about
A ‘basket of goods approach’ as an alternative to strict legal distinctions between migrants and refugees
A lot of the normative literature on the duty to protect refugeessets out from the assumption that refugees’ reasons to migrateare qualitatively distinct from other migrants’ reasonsand that it is
Peculiar Leap in the Protection of Asylum Seekers: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights' Jurisprudence on the Protection of Asylum Seekers
This article pursues to clarify the crucial contribution of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to protect the rights of refugees and asylum seekers. It debates that the Court has instituted its
Trading Places: Securitising Refugee and Asylum Policies in Germany and the United States
  • J. Mushaben
  • Political Science
    German-American Relations in the 21st Century
  • 2020
Given their radically different historical approaches to immigration and refugees, one would expect Germany and the United States to have adopted diverging policies in these domains following the
Refugee Crisis and Migrations at the Gates of Europe: Deterritoriality, Extraterritoriality and Externalization of Border Controls
ABSTRACT: The refugee crisis has shaped a new perception of the migration reality in Europe. The ramifications of its impact on European integration are visible and enduring. The EU’s response has


The Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations of States
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights require states parties to respect and ensure the rights of persons subject to or within their
Abstract Issues of State complicity arise ever more frequently in international relations. Rules which deal with the responsibility of States for aiding or assisting in the commission of
The First Decade of EU Migration and Asylum Law
Preface to the First Decade of EU Migration and Asylum Law Elspeth Guild, Paul Minderhoud & Ryszard Cholewinski Introduction: Migration and Law in Europe Kees Groenendijk Section 1: EU Citizens?
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
This chapter describes the evolution of the history of legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory that has been dealt by the International Court of Justice
Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility
This chapter discusses complicity between bilateralism and community interest, the concept of complicity in Article 16 ASR, and a network of rules on complicity.
The Border Abroad - Visas and Border Controls
  • In Search of Europe's Borders
  • 2002