No regulatory double standard for natural health products.

@article{MacDonald2011NoRD,
  title={No regulatory double standard for natural health products.},
  author={Noni E. MacDonald and Stuart Macleod and Matthew Stanbrook and Paul C. H{\'e}bert and Kenneth M. Flegel and Daniel Rosenfield},
  journal={CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne},
  year={2011},
  volume={183 18},
  pages={2079}
}
ucts are effective therapies and are safer than pres cription drugs. This is oddly illogical reasoning. Although both appear to carry a similar Health Canada stamp of approval, there remains a specious dichotomy in the criteria and evidence needed for approval and monitoring of a drug compared with a natural health product. Before marketing a substance as a drug, a pharmaceutical company must provide extensive evidence, typically from Phase III randomized controlled trials, that its product… CONTINUE READING
Related Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 147 times. VIEW TWEETS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-3 of 3 references

Coca-Cola cuts vitamin A content in fruit beverage

S. Schmidt
Vancouver Sun 2011 Sept. 23. Available: www.vancouversun.com/health/Coca+Cola+cuts+vitamin +content+fruit+beverage/5446524/story.html#ixzz1algJY7bE (accessed • 2011

Energy drinks should only be sold under supervision of a pharmacist: Health Canada panel

S. Schmidt
National Post 2011 Sept • 2011

Nivea rapped a second time

V. Lu
Toronto Star 2011 Sept. 22. Available: www.thestar .com /business/article/1058029–nivea-rapped-a-second-time (accessed • 2011

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…