No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures

@article{Hauskeller2011NoPF,
  title={No Philosophy for Swine: John Stuart Mill on the Quality of Pleasures},
  author={Michael Hauskeller},
  journal={Utilitas},
  year={2011},
  volume={23},
  pages={428 - 446}
}
I argue that Mill introduced the distinction between quality and quantity of pleasures in order to fend off the then common charge that utilitarianism is ‘a philosophy for swine’ and to accommodate the (still) widespread intuition that the life of a human is better, in the sense of being intrinsically more valuable, than the life of an animal. I argue that in this he fails because in order to do successfully he would have to show not only that the life of a human is preferable to that of an… 
Recent Critics of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism
Abstract Two recent critics of Mill's qualitative hedonism, Michael Hauskeller and Kristin Schaupp, argue that Mill's distinction between higher and lower pleasures was largely unsuccessful. They
Do Animals Have a Bad Life?
Abstract:It has been argued that, due to our commitment to distributive justice and fairness, we have a moral obligation toward animals to enhance, or "uplift," them to quasihuman status, so that
J. S. Mill on Higher Pleasures and Modes of Existence
The passage of Mill’s Utilitarianism that sets out the condition in which one pleasure has a superior quality than another stokes interpretive controversy. According to the Lexical Interpretation,
Higher Pleasures, Civic Virtue, and Democracy: A Reconstruction of
This article takes a start in the utilitarian philosophy of John Stuart Mill and considers an interpretation of the concept of "higher pleasures" as referring to "political" pleasures. This
Higher Pleasures, Civic Virtue, and Democracy : a Reconstruction of Millian Themes
This article takes a start in the utilitarian philosophy of John Stuart Mill and considers an interpretation of the concept of “higher pleasures” as referring to “political” pleasures. This
Two Pessimisms in Mill
  • J. Fox
  • Art, Philosophy
    Utilitas
  • 2021
Abstract Mill defines utilitarianism as the combination of a “theory of life” and a moral claim: only pleasure and freedom from pain are desirable as ends, and the promotion of happiness is the sole
Intuitions and values: Re-assessing the classical arguments against quantitative hedonism
Few philosophers today embrace quantitative hedonism, which states that a person’s well-being depends only on the amount of her experienced happiness and suffering. Despite recent attempts to
Tourism, Animals and Utilitarianism
Abstract Although tourism researchers have recently started to examine moral issues tied to the use of animals in tourism, there is much work that needs to be done. It is particularly important to

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
Interpreting Mill's Qualitative Hedonism
Against Schmidt-Petri's claim, I argue that John Stuart Mill is committed to the view that one pleasure is higher in quality than another if and only if at least a majority of those people who are
A Defence of Mill's Qualitative Hedonism
IN HIS well known proposition that pleasures differ qualitatively, Mill seems to be arguing three principal points. (1) 'Mental' pleasures as a kind are intrinsically 'more desirable and more
Millian Qualitative Superiorities and Utilitarianism, Part I*
Arrhenius and Rabinowicz (henceforth, AR) have argued that Millian qualitative superiorities are possible without assuming that any pleasure, or type of pleasure, is infinitely superior to another.
Mill on Quality and Quantity
A well known paragraph in Mill's ‘Utilitarianism’ has standardly been misread. Mill does not claim that if some pleasure is of ‘higher quality’, then it will be (or ought to be) chosen over the
Collected Works of John Stuart Mill
Born in London in 1806 into a pedigree of intellect, and educated at the knee of his father, the Scottish philosopher James Mill, John Stuart Mill became one of the 19th century's most influential
John Stuart Mill and the religion of humanity
"Today, I believe, one ought to keep total silence on the question of religion when writing for an English audience, though indirectly one may strike any blow one wishes at religious beliefs." - JOHN
Prolegomena to ethics
Preface Introduction: The idea of a natural science of morals Book I. Metaphysics of Knowledge: 1. The spiritual principle in knowledge and in nature 2. The relation of man, as intelligence, to the
The Consistency of Qualitative Hedonism and the Value of (at Least Some) Malicious Pleasures
In this article, I examine two of the standard objections to forms of value hedonism. The first is the common claim, most famously made by Bradley and Moore, that Mill's qualitative hedonism is
The Cambridge companion to Mill
Introduction: the fortunes of liberal naturalism John Skorupski 1. Language and logic John Skorupski 2. Mill, mathematics and the naturalist tradition Philip Kitcher 3. Induction and the scientific
The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill
Preface to the Second Edition Acknowledgements Introduction The Deductive Conception of Explanation 'Real' Inference Induction and Its Canons Tendencies and Uniformities Mathematics as an Inductive
...
1
2
...