No Evidence from Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jews

@inproceedings{Behar2013NoEF,
  title={No Evidence from Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jews},
  author={Doron M Behar and Mait Metspalu and Yael Baran and Naama M. Kopelman and Bayazit Yunusbayev and Ariella L. Gladstein and Shay Tzur and Hovhannes Sahakyan and Ardeshir Bahmanimehr and Levon Yepiskoposyan and Kristiina Tambets and Elza K. Khusnutdinova and Alena Kushniarevich and Oleg P. Balanovsky and Elena Balanovsky and Lejla Kova{\vc}evi{\'c} and Damir Marjanovic and Evelin Mihailov and Anastasia Kouvatsi and Costas D. Triantaphyllidis and Roy J. King and Ornella Semino and Antonio Torroni and Michael F. Hammer and Ene Metspalu and Karl Skorecki and Saharon Rosset and Eran Halperin and Richard Villems and Noah A. Rosenberg},
  booktitle={Human biology},
  year={2013}
}
Abstract The origin and history of the Ashkenazi Jewish population have long been of great interest, and advances in high-throughput genetic analysis have recently provided a new approach for investigating these topics. [] Key Method This data set contains genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 1,774 samples from 106 Jewish and non-Jewish populations that span the possible regions of potential Ashkenazi ancestry: Europe, the Middle East, and the region historically associated with the Khazar…
A genetic contribution from the Far East into Ashkenazi Jews via the ancient Silk Road
TLDR
The existence of some eastern Eurasian haplotypes in eastern Ashkenazi Jews supports an East Asian genetic contribution, likely from Chinese, and demonstrates that the historical exchange between Ashkenazim and the Far East was not confined to the cultural sphere but also extended to an exchange of genes.
The time and place of European admixture in Ashkenazi Jewish history
TLDR
An in-depth analysis of the sources of European gene flow and the time of admixture events, using a wide spectrum of genetic methods, extensive simulations, and a number of new approaches is presented.
Diverse genetic origins of medieval steppe nomad conquerors – a response to Mikheyev et al. (2019)
TLDR
A careful examination reveals grave concerns regarding all the aspects of the study from the identification of the “Khazar” samples, the choice of environment for ancient DNA sequencing, and the analyses, which demonstrate that their analyses yield nonsensical results.
The Genetic Legacy of the Expansion of Turkic-Speaking Nomads across Eurasia
TLDR
The results indicate historical admixture among Turkic peoples, and the recent shared ancestry with modern populations in SSM supports one of the hypothesized homelands for their nomadic Turkic and related Mongolic ancestors.
Paternal genetic affinity between Iranian Azeris and neighboring populations
TLDR
Like other Iranian ethnic groups, Iranian Azeris showed a heterogeneous paternal genetic structure and have preserved minor share of Y-haplogroup of central Asian ancestry tracts in their genomes, which is in agreement with the historical period of major Turkic migrations.
The Genetic Traces of Expansion
TLDR
It is shown that Turkic-speaking peoples sampled across the East, Caucasus, East Europe, and Central Asia share varying proportions of Asian ancestry that originate in a single area, southern Siberia and Mongolia.
Substructured Population Growth in the Ashkenazi Jews Inferred with Approximate Bayesian Computation.
TLDR
Whether the western and eastern groups of the Ashkenazi Jews are genetically distinct, and if so, what demographic processes contributed to population differentiation, is determined.
Substructured population growth in the Ashkenazi Jews inferred with Approximate Bayesian Computation
TLDR
This work used Approximate Bayesian Computation to choose among models of AJ history and infer demographic parameter values, including divergence times, effective population size, and gene flow, and found that the most likely model was population differentiation between the Eastern and Western AJ ~400 years ago.
Middle eastern genetic legacy in the paternal and maternal gene pools of Chuetas
TLDR
The composition of their uniparentally transmitted lineages demonstrates a remarkable signature of Middle Eastern ancestry—despite some degree of host admixture—confirming Chuetas have retained over the centuries a considerable degree of ancestral genetic signature along with the cultural memory of their Jewish origin.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 62 REFERENCES
Contrasting patterns of Y chromosome variation in Ashkenazi Jewish and host non-Jewish European populations
TLDR
It is striking that whereas Ashkenazi populations are genetically more diverse at both the SNP and STR level compared with their European non-Jewish counterparts, they have greatly reduced within-haplogroup STR variability, especially in those founder haplogroups that migrated from the Near East.
Implications for health and disease in the genetic signature of the Ashkenazi Jewish population
TLDR
An Ashkenazi Jewish-specific genetic signature was identified that differentiated these subjects from both European and Middle Eastern samples, and gene ontology analysis revealed an enrichment of genes functioning in transepithelial chloride transport, such as CFTR, and in equilibrioception, potentially shedding light on cystic fibrosis, Usher syndrome and other diseases over-represented in this population.
Multiple origins of Ashkenazi Levites: Y chromosome evidence for both Near Eastern and European ancestries.
TLDR
Comparisons with other Jewish and non-Jewish groups suggest that a founding event, probably involving one or very few European men occurring at a time close to the initial formation and settlement of the Ashkenazi community, is the most likely explanation for the presence of this distinctive haplogroup found today in >50% ofAshkenazi Levites.
Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes.
TLDR
The hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population is supported, and most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora is suggested.
The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses
  • E. Elhaik
  • History
    Genome biology and evolution
  • 2013
TLDR
The findings support the Khazarian hypothesis and portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Near Eastern-Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries, thereby consolidating previous contradictory reports of Jewish ancestry.
The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people
TLDR
High-density bead arrays to genotype individuals from 14 Jewish Diaspora communities are used to compare patterns of genome-wide diversity with those from 69 Old World non-Jewish populations, of which 25 have not previously been reported.
The common, Near‐Eastern origin of Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews supported by Y‐chromosome similarity
TLDR
A preliminary evaluation suggests that the contribution of foreign males to the Ashkenazi gene pool has been very low (1% or less per generation).
The Y chromosome pool of Jews as part of the genetic landscape of the Middle East.
TLDR
The investigation of the genetic relationship among three Jewish communities revealed that Kurdish and Sephardic Jews were indistinguishable from one another, whereas both differed slightly, yet significantly, from Ashkenazi Jews.
Extended Y chromosome haplotypes resolve multiple and unique lineages of the Jewish priesthood
TLDR
The hypothesis of a common origin of the CMH in the Near East well before the dispersion of the Jewish people into separate communities is supported and indicates that the majority of contemporary Jewish priests descend from a limited number of paternal lineages.
...
...