Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labour

@article{Kupferminc1993NifedipineVR,
  title={Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labour},
  author={M. Kupferminc and J. Lessing and Y. Yaron and M. Peyser},
  journal={BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology},
  year={1993},
  volume={100}
}
  • M. Kupferminc, J. Lessing, +1 author M. Peyser
  • Published 1993
  • Medicine
  • BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • Objective To compare the efficacy of tocolysis with specific regimens of nifedipine and ritodrine. Maternal side effects and neonatal outcome also were evaluated. 
    103 Citations
    An update on the controversies of tocolytic therapy for the prevention of preterm birth
    • 28
    Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor. Comparison of their efficacy and secondary effects.
    • 37
    Nifedipine Versus Ritodrine for Suppression of Preterm Labor and Analysis of Side Effects
    • 12
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Optimising maternal‐fetal outcomes in preterm labour: a decision analysis
    • 27
    A prospective, randomized trial of nifedipine vs. ritodrine in threatened preterm labor
    • 73

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
    The use of a calcium antagonist (nifedipine) to suppress preterm labour
    • 136
    Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppressing preterm labor.
    • 25
    Tocolytic and hemodynamic effects of nifedipine in the ewe.
    • 44
    Nifedipine pharmacokinetics during preterm labor tocolysis.
    • 57
    Effect of Nicardipine HC1 on Prematurely Induced Uterine Activity in the Pregnant Rabbit
    • 16
    Calcium entry blockers: uses and implications for anesthesiologists.
    • 122