Nietzsche and the Morality Critics

@article{Leiter1997NietzscheAT,
  title={Nietzsche and the Morality Critics},
  author={Brian Leiter},
  journal={Ethics},
  year={1997},
  volume={107},
  pages={250 - 285}
}
  • B. Leiter
  • Published 1 January 1997
  • Philosophy
  • Ethics
Comparaison entre la philosophie morale de Nietzsche et la nouvelle critique de la moralite qui se developpe dans le monde anglo-saxon. Alors que la critique nietzscheenne de la moralite s'inscrit dans une critique speculative de la culture europeenne en general, la critique anglo-saxonne se limite aux theories particulieres de la moralite (these de l'incompatibilite, these du surpassement) 
Sobre a possibilidade de reflexão ética fora da abrangência da crítica nietzschiana à moral
The paper reconstructs two attempts at outlining the scope of Nietzsche’s criticism of morality: the first attributes to Nietzsche a radical rejection of morality and associates him to an imoralist
A Nietzschean Critique of Obligation-Centred Moral Theory
Abstract The focal objection of Nietzsche’s critique of morality is that morality is disvaluable because antagonistic to the highest forms of human excellence. Recent advances in Nietzsche commentary
The ‘End’ of Kant‐in‐Himself: Nietzschean difference
Kant's over‐reliance on universal reason and his subjection of free will to the moral law can be seen as normalising a particular and restrictive view of autonomous human existence—a view implicit in
Zarathustra’s metaethics
Nietzsche takes moral judgments to be false beliefs, and encourages us to pursue subjective nonmoral value arising from our passions. His view that strong and unified passions make one virtuous is
Is Ethical Theory Opposed to Moral Practice?
Many philosophers in the Anglo-American tradition have held that the predominant modern western theories of ethics like Kant’s deontological theory and Mill’s Utilitarianism have failed to deliver as
Há espaço para uma concepção não moral da normatividade prática em Nietzsche?: notas sobre um debate em andamento
This paper is divided in three sections. The purpose of the first section is to show how the search for an alternative conception of practical normativity by contemporary moral philosophers keeps
Nietzsche: Virtue Ethics. . . Virtue Politics?
Aristotelian notion of megalopsychia found in Nicomachean Ethics and the figure of the Ubermensch. I will approach this connection in a variety of ways in the first section of my essay and will show
The Second Treatise in In the Genealogy of Morality: Nietzsche on the Origin of the Bad Conscience
On a postcard to Franz Overbeck from January 4, 1888, Nietzsche makes some illuminating remarks with respect to the three treatises in his book On the Genealogy of Morality.2 Nietzsche says that,
A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche
The purpose of this paper is to critically examine immoralistic interpretation of Nietzsche’s philosophy. Immoralism can be considered an attempt to understand Nietzsche's position as denying
Nietzschean Pragmatism
Nietzschean pragmatism is the view that one should believe whatever best promotes life, even things that are untrue because they fail to correspond to reality. Nietzsche expresses this view in early
...
1
2
3
4
5
...