• Corpus ID: 46682674

Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems

  title={Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems},
  author={Robert H. Bork},
  journal={Indiana Law Journal},
  • R. Bork
  • Published 1971
  • Sociology
  • Indiana Law Journal

Lawyers and the Conservative Counterrevolution

What roles have lawyers played in the conservative counterrevolution in US law and public policy? Two recent books, Jefferson Decker's The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the

Originalism and Constructive Interpretation

This essay argues that a number of Dworkin’s signature jurisprudential claims -- including his criticism of Hart’s model of rules, his moralized reading of the Constitution, and his defense of

Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship

  • M. Graber
  • History
    Law & Social Inquiry
  • 2002
The reviews are in and the critics are nearly unanimous. The Warren Court and American Politics is one of the most important books published on American constitutional politics this decade. Jeffrey

Beyond the Second Amendment: An Individual Right to Arms Viewed through the Ninth Amendment

Professor of Legal Studies in Business and Taxation, Franklin and Marshall College. Of Counsel, Kirkpatrick and Lockhart. J.D. 1984, Harvard Law School, B.S.B.A. 1981, Magna Cum Laude, West Virginia

“Clocks Must Always Be Turned Back”: Brown v. Board of Education and the Racial Origins of Constitutional Originalism

The Republican Party has adopted constitutional “originalism” as its touchstone. Existing accounts of this development tell either a teleological story, with legal academics as the progenitors, or

Law, science, and humanity

Opposition by the American Psychological Association and the American Psychology-Law Society to the nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court would have been justified on normative grounds by

Brown v. Board of Education and the Politics That Created a Constitutional Icon

Few scholars or educators of law or politics would dispute the contention of the authors of a recent retrospective on Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka that the Supreme Court’s 1954 school