Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias

  title={Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias},
  author={John W. Krakauer and Asif A. Ghazanfar and Alex Gomez-Marin and Malcolm A. MacIver and David Poeppel},

Figures from this paper

Context-sensitive computational mechanistic explanation in cognitive neuroscience
The need for change to brain mapping efforts in the face of instability is demonstrated if cognitive neuroscience is to maintain its central goal of constructing computational mechanistic explanations of behavior and it is shown that such explanations must be contextual at all levels.
Harnessing behavioral diversity to understand circuits for cognition
It is argued that neural data should be recorded during rich behavioral tasks, to model cognitive processes and estimate latent behavioral variables, and to provide a more complete picture of how movements shape neural dynamics and reflect changes in brain state.
Single-case experimental designs for behavioral neuroscience.
  • P. Soto
  • Psychology, Biology
    Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
  • 2020
Collaborations between behavior analysts and behavioral neuroscientists will bring the world within the skin under direct experimental control and broaden the understanding of the determinants of behavior.
Neuroscience bias: Reproducibility and exploration of psychological mechanisms
By systematically reviewing empirical studies on neuroscience bias, it is revealed that the reproducibility of neuroscience bias was debated, but the effect exists and neuroscience bias could be attributed to people’s preference for the reductionism and psychological essentialism.
Natural behavior is the language of the brain
Harnessing behavioral diversity to understand neural computations for cognition
The lure of misleading causal statements in functional connectivity research.
It is argued that mis-inferences of causality from correlation are augmented by an implicit redefinition of words that suggest mechanisms, such as connectivity, causality, and flow, which tell us little about mechanisms.


Big behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience
It is argued that 'big behavioral data' presents challenges proportionate to its promise and described how these challenges might be met through opportunities afforded by the two rival conceptual legacies of twentieth century behavioral science, ethology and psychology.
The importance of task design and behavioral control for understanding the neural basis of cognitive functions
How cognitive theory guides neuroscience
Revolutions in Neuroscience: Tool Development
A metascientific approach is adopted and the development of two recent neuroscience revolutions are examined: the impact of engineered genetically mutated mammals in the search for causal mechanisms of “higher” cognitive functions; and the more recent impact of optogenetics and designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs.
Defining the Relation Between Linguistics and Neuroscience
The popularity of the study of language and the brain is evident from the large number of studies published in the last 15 or so years that have used PET, fMRI, EEG, MEG, TMS, or NIRS to investigate
Modular Processes in Mind and Brain
One approach to understanding a comple x rocess starts with an attempt to divide it into m dules: subprocesses that are independent in some sense, and ha ve istinct functions. In this paper I discuss
Could a Neuroscientist Understand a Microprocessor?
It is shown that the approaches reveal interesting structure in the data but do not meaningfully describe the hierarchy of information processing in the microprocessor, suggesting current analytic approaches in neuroscience may fall short of producing meaningful understanding of neural systems, regardless of the amount of data.
Are central pattern generators understandable?
A basic strategy that would provide sufficient information for neural modeling would include: identifying and characterizing each element in the CPG network; specifying the synaptic connectivity between the elements; and analyzing nonlinear synaptic properties and interactions by means of the connectivity matrix.
On building a bridge between brain and behavior.
  • J. Schall
  • Psychology, Biology
    Annual review of psychology
  • 2004
This review evaluates specific conceptual and technical limits of claims of correspondence between neural events, overt behavior, and hypothesized covert processes examined using data on the neural control of saccadic eye movements.
Marr and Reductionism
It is argued that Marr was correct in his criticism of the reductionists of his time-they were only describing (cellular activity), not explaining (cognitive functions) but contemporary cognitive scientists now owe us a new defense of Marr's famous method and the advantages of its explanations over the type now pursued successfully in current reductionist neuroscience.