Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates. II. Language and praxic abilities.

Abstract

A basic neuropsychological examination of language and praxic abilities was administered to extreme educational groups (100 illiterates and 100 professionals). Subjects were matched according to sex and age (16-25, 26-35, 36-45, 46-55, and 56-65). The following tasks were included: language comprehension, phonological discrimination, naming (objects, figures, and body parts), repetition of words, verbal fluency, calculation, buccofacial and ideomotor praxis, finger alternating movements, meaningless movements, cancellation task, coordinated movements with both hands, and motor impersistence tasks. All the differences between the two educational groups were statistically significant. Two of the eight language tests (phonological discrimination and naming figures) and three of the seven praxic tests (buccofacial praxis, coordinated movements, and cancellation task) showed differences between age groups with a better performance in the younger groups. Calculation tasks and ideomotor praxis showed differences between sexes with a better performance in males. Influence of educational factors in performing routine neuropsychological tests is analyzed.

Statistics

01020'95'98'01'04'07'10'13'16
Citations per Year

140 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 140 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Rosselli1990NeuropsychologicalAI, title={Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates. II. Language and praxic abilities.}, author={Marten Rosselli and A . Rodrı́guez - Ardila and Pablo Rosas}, journal={Brain and cognition}, year={1990}, volume={12 2}, pages={281-96} }