Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives

@article{Rommelfanger2018NeuroethicsQT,
  title={Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives},
  author={Karen S. Rommelfanger and Sung‐Jin Jeong and Arisa Ema and Tamami Fukushi and Kiyoto Kasai and Khara M. Ramos and Arleen Salles and Ilina Singh and Jordan P. Amadio and Guo-Qiang Bi and Paul Boshears and Adrian Carter and Anna Devor and Kenji Doya and Hermann Garden and Judy Illes and L. Syd M Johnson and Lyric A. Jorgenson and Bang Ook Jun and Inyoung Lee and Patricia T. Michie and Tsuyoshi Miyakawa and Eisuke Nakazawa and Osamu Sakura and Hagop Sarkissian and Laura Specker Sullivan and Stepheni Uh and David E. Winickoff and Paul Root Wolpe and Kevin Chien-Chang Wu and Akira Yasamura and Jialin C. Zheng},
  journal={Neuron},
  year={2018},
  volume={100},
  pages={19-36}
}

Figures from this paper

Assessing the Perceived Value of Neuroethics Questions and Policy to Neuro-Entrepreneurs

Key neuroethical themes and processual pain points of neurotech entrepreneurs throughout the innovation process are identified and actionable steps toward advancing and accelerating societally impactful neuroscience are provided.

Of Ethical Frameworks and Neuroethics in Big Neuroscience Projects: A View from the HBP

The need for an ethical framework for the BRAIN Initiative and for further integration of neuroethics and neuroscience is assessed and some of the issues raised are assessed and an explanation of how they are addressed in the Human Brain Project is provided.

Ethical Implications of BRAIN 2.0: Beyond Bioethics, Beyond Borders

This commentary applauds the goal of integration, while stressing that within BRAIN 2.0 it is needed to have a more explicit view of integration—one that pushed for integration of disciplines.

NeuroEthics and the BRAIN Initiative: Where Are We? Where Are We Going?

Abstract From its inception, the NIH Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative, an ambitious project focused on understanding the human brain, has made a

Neuroethical Issues in Times of Health Crisis. What Roles for Neurosciences, IA, Neurotechnologies?

How can neuroscience help everyone to live and care for our confined brains? Understanding and studying human behaviour allows us to measure the impact of such confinement on each of us and to

Gaps in Neuroethics in Relation to Brain Computer Interfaces: Systematic Literature Review

The goal of this paper is to inform future development in the area and provide a springboard for further research and to raise awareness of the need for the spotlight on ethics to keep up with BCI advancements.

Contextual and Cultural Perspectives on Neurorights: Reflections Toward an International Consensus.

The development and use of advanced and innovative neuroscience, neurotechnology and some forms of artificial intelligence have exposed potential threats to the human condition, including human

Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field.

This call to action to help shape neuroethics into a discipline that develops rigorous research agendas through relationships with interdisciplinary partners, that is broadly inclusive and attends to issues beyond novel neurotechnologies, and that is devoted to the translation of scholarship into practice is outlined.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 184 REFERENCES

Issues in neurotechnology governance

This report provides a summary of the main discussion points emerging from the Expert Consultation on “Neurotechnology and Society”, held on 14-15 September 2017 in Washington D.C., United States.

Pragmatic Neuroethics: Improving Treatment and Understanding of the Mind-Brain

Today the measurable health burden of neurological and mental health disorders matches or even surpasses any other cluster of health conditions. At the same time, the clinical applications of recent

Potential for Bias in the Context of Neuroethics

  • S. Bird
  • Psychology
    Sci. Eng. Ethics
  • 2012
It is important that the training of neuroscientists, and research practice itself, include open and in-depth discussion and examination of the assumptions that underlie research, and the general public is made aware of the limitations as well as the strengths of the science.

Social Neuroscience and Neuroethics : A Fruitful Synergy

This chapter provides a richer account of neuroethics than the one given in social neuroscientists’ common descriptions of that field and suggests that, when understood in this richer (and in this view more adequate) fashion, neuroethic may open up productive avenues for research and play a key role in allowing us to determine social neuroscience’s contribution to unveiling important epistemological as well as ontological notions.

Theoretical Framing of Neuroethics: The Need for a Conceptual Approach

There are different dominant perspectives, theories, and methodologies within neuroethics, each importantly shaping the identification, understanding, and discussion of the relevant ethical, social,

Ethics in neuroscience graduate training programs: Views and models from Canada

Consideration of the ethical, social, and policy implications of research has become increasingly important to scientists and scholars whose work focuses on brain and mind, but limited empirical data

Neuroethics, Gender and the Response to Difference

This paper examines how the new field of neuroethics is responding to the old problem of difference, particularly to those ideas of biological difference emerging from neuroimaging research that

The Sociology of Neuroethics: Expectational Discourses and the Rise of a New Discipline

The sudden emergence of the discipline ‘neuroethics’ is an intriguing event from the perspective of the sociologies of medicine, science and bioethics. Despite calls for greater social science

More Education, Less Administration: Reflections of Neuroimagers’ Attitudes to Ethics Through the Qualitative Looking Glass

Focus groups and interviews to explore neuroscientists' sense of responsibility about integrating ethics into neuroimaging and readiness to adopt new ethics strategies as part of their research found safety, trust and virtue were key motivators for incorporating ethics into Neuroimaging research.

Cultural neuroscience of the self: understanding the social grounding of the brain.

It is proposed that primary values of culture such as independence and interdependence are reflected in the compositions of cultural tasks and that active and sustained engagement in these tasks yields culturally patterned neural activities of the brain, thereby laying the ground for the embodied construction of the self and identity.
...