Neurochemical and behavioral differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats

  title={Neurochemical and behavioral differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats},
  author={James R. Shoblock and Eric B. Sullivan and Isabelle M. Maisonneuve and Stanley D. Glick},
Abstract Rationale. Methamphetamine (METH) and amphetamine (AMPH) are both abused psychostimulants. Although METH is generally accepted to be more addictive and potent than its analogue AMPH, there are no known neurobiological differences in action between the two drugs that may account for such differences. Objective. METH and AMPH were compared to determine potential mechanisms for such differences between the two drugs in order to provide new targets for the treatment of METH addiction… 
Differences between d-methamphetamine and d-amphetamine in rats: working memory, tolerance, and extinction
These results indicate that METH and AMPH differ in altering working memory and the expression of tolerance, perhaps due to differences in behavioral inhibition.
Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Differentially Affect Dopamine Transporters in Vitro and in Vivo*
It is demonstrated that METH has a stronger effect on DAT-mediated cell physiology than AMPH, which may contribute to the euphoric and addictive properties of METH compared with AMPH.
Differences between dextroamphetamine and methamphetamine: behavioral changes and oxidative damage in brain of Wistar rats
It is demonstrated that the m-AM PH induces oxidative damage greater than d-AMPH, showing neurochemical differences previously unknown.
A comparison of amphetamine- and methamphetamine-induced locomotor activity in rats: evidence for qualitative differences in behavior
Specific conditions where METH is more potent than AMPH are found, but others that used higher doses of these drugs are not consistent with the generalized characterization of METH as a more potent psychostimulant.
Attenuation of d-amphetamine self-administration by baclofen in the rat: behavioral and neurochemical correlates
Findings add to previous findings showing that baclofen attenuates the reinforcing effects of psychostimulant drugs, and suggest that further investigation into the effects of GABAB receptor agonists on drug self-administration is warranted.
The relative reinforcing strength of methamphetamine and D-amphetamine in monkeys self-administering cocaine
Although differences in availability and other social factors likely impact relative rates of abuse, the present data suggest that the greater reinforcing strength of methamphetamine contributes to its increased use compared with D-amphetamine.
Distinct dose‐dependent effects of methamphetamine on real‐time dopamine transmission in the rat nucleus accumbens and behaviors
This study investigated how systemic administration of escalating, sub-neurotoxic doses of METH alter extracellular DA regulation in the nucleus accumbens, in both anesthetized and awake-behaving rats through the use of in vivo fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and suggested that acute METH-induced enhancement of extrace cellular DA concentrations dose-dependently activate D2 autoreceptors.
Comparison of intranasal methamphetamine and d-amphetamine self-administration by humans.
Methamphetamine and d-amphetamines appear to produce a similar dose-related profile of effects in humans, which supports their equivalence for abuse potential.
Behavioral and antinociceptive effects of different psychostimulant drugs in prenatally methamphetamine-exposed rats.
The different analgesic potencies of psychostimulants and MOR at different body sites indicate the possible existence of a somatotopic organization of pain inhibition, which is controlled by different mechanisms.


Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of the actions of D-amphetamine and D-methamphetamine on the dopamine terminal.
Results indicate that Amp and MeAmp pharmacokinetics and their subsequent dopamine responses in the striatum are equivalent, and can be extended to the interpretation of other comparative studies that assess effects of Amp and meAmp.
Hippocampus norepinephrine, caudate dopamine and serotonin, and behavioral responses to the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine
The results of these studies indicate that, while the dopamine, norepinephrine and 5-HT responses to these drugs probably contribute to the expression of stimulant-induced behaviors, simple relationships between the neurotransmitter responses and the behavioral profiles were not evident.
Methamphetamine-induced behavioural effects and brain concentrations of methamphetamine and its metabolite amphetamine in mice.
(+)-Methamphetamine (MA) produced dose-related behavioural changes in mice. There was a correlation between the type of behavioural response and the peak brain MA concentration after the i.p.
Possible involvement of medial prefrontal cortex in amphetamine-induced sensitization of mesolimbic dopamine function.
Physiologic, subjective, and behavioral effects of amphetamine, methamphetamine, ephedrine, phenmetrazine, and methylphenidate in man
This study suggests that it is unlikely that these central actions in man are a consequence of the release of norepinephrine in the brain, and suggests that these five agents share a common mode of central action.
Both glutamate receptor antagonists and prefrontal cortex lesions prevent induction of cocaine sensitization and associated neuroadaptations
It is indicated that glutamate transmission from mPFC to the mesoaccumbens DA system is critical for the induction of cocaine sensitization and its cellular correlates.
An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine
Male albino rats were trained and tested on a two-lever discrimination task based upon the presence or absence of d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg). This compound was found to produce strong discriminative
A comparison of d-amphetamine, l-amphetamine, and methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys.