Neural processing of iterated prisoner’s dilemma outcomes indicates next-round choice and speed to reciprocate cooperation

  title={Neural processing of iterated prisoner’s dilemma outcomes indicates next-round choice and speed to reciprocate cooperation},
  author={Francisco Cervantes Constantino and Santiago Garat and Eliana Nicolaisen-Sobesky and Valentina Paz and Eduardo Mart{\'i}nez-Montes and Dominique Kessel and {\'A}lvaro Cabana and Victoria B. Gradin},
  journal={Social Neuroscience},
  pages={103 - 120}
ABSTRACT The iterated prisoner’s dilemma (iPD) game is a well-established model for testing how people cooperate, and the neural processes that unfold after its distinct outcomes have been partly described. Recent theoretical models suggest evolution favors intuitive cooperation, which raises questions on the behavioral but also neural timelines involved. We studied the outcome/feedback stage of iPD rounds with electroencephalography (EEG) methods. Results showed that neural signals associated… 

Feedback processing in attack and defense conflicts: a neurophysiological study

Results showed that individuals tend to invest more and decide faster when playing in defence, rather than in attack, which supports the theoretical model positing that attack elicits more deliberate and less automatic brain processes than defence.

Event-related correlates of evolving trust evaluations

ABSTRACT Accurate decisions about whether to trust someone are critical for adaptive social behavior. Previous research into trustworthiness decisions about face stimuli have focused on individuals.



Event-related potentials in response to cheating and cooperation in a social dilemma game.

The results suggest that it is not the negativity of social information, but rather its motivational and behavioral relevance that determines its processing.

Neural basis of conditional cooperation.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging is used to investigate the neural system underlying conditional cooperation by scanning participants during interaction with cooperative, neutral and non-cooperative opponents in prisoner's dilemma games and suggests that cognitive inhibition of the motivation to cooperate withNon-cooperators drives the conditional behavior.

Cooperation, Fast and Slow

This theory predicts that deliberation will undermine pure cooperation but not strategic cooperation, and reveals 17.3% more pure cooperation when intuition was promoted over deliberation, but no significant difference in strategic cooperation between more intuitive and more deliberative conditions.

The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation

Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation

An evolutionary game-theoretic model of dual-process agents playing prisoner’s dilemma games finds that, across many types of environments, evolution only ever favors agents who always intuitively defect or are intuitively predisposed to cooperate but who, when deliberating, switch to defection if it is in their self-interest to do so.

Defecting or Not Defecting: How to “Read” Human Behavior during Cooperative Games by EEG Measurements

Graph analysis of hyper-brain networks constructed from the EEG scanning of 26 couples of individuals playing the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma reveals the possibility to predict non-cooperative interactions during the decision-making phase.

A Neural Basis for Social Cooperation