• Corpus ID: 203647244

Network Structures of Collective Intelligence: The Contingent Benefits of Group Discussion

@article{Becker2020NetworkSO,
  title={Network Structures of Collective Intelligence: The Contingent Benefits of Group Discussion},
  author={Joshua Aaron Becker and Abdullah Almaatouq and Agnes Horvat},
  journal={ArXiv},
  year={2020},
  volume={abs/2009.07202}
}
Research on belief formation has produced contradictory findings on whether and when communication between group members will improve the accuracy of numeric estimates such as economic forecasts, medical diagnoses, and job candidate assessments. While some evidence suggests that carefully mediated processes such as the "Delphi method" produce more accurate beliefs than unstructured discussion, others argue that unstructured discussion outperforms mediated processes. Still others argue that… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

The Crowd Classification Problem: Social Dynamics of Binary-Choice Accuracy
TLDR
Surprisingly, when people exchange numeric estimates prior to voting, the binary-choice vote can become less accurate, even as the average numeric estimate becomes more accurate.
The Network Dynamics of Social and Technological Conventions
TLDR
This paper uses agent-based simulation to investigate the effect of network structure on a standard model of convention formation, finding that network centralization increases the speed of Convention formation but also decreases the likelihood that the best strategy will become widely adopted.
Can Online Juries Make Consistent, Repeatable Decisions?
TLDR
This paper reports an online experiment that changes participants’ pseudonyms as they appear to collaborators, temporarily masking a jury’s awareness that they have deliberated together before, and finds that aggregating groups’ perspectives without deliberation erodes consistency.
The cost of coordination can exceed the benefit of collaboration in performing complex tasks
TLDR
It is found that dyads gradually improve in performance but do not experience a collective benefit compared to individuals in most situations; rather, the cost of team coordination to efficiency and speed is consistently larger than the leverage of having a partner, even if they are expertly trained.
Empirica: a virtual lab for high-throughput macro-level experiments
TLDR
Empirica is a modular virtual lab that offers a solution to the usability–functionality trade-off by employing a “flexible defaults” design strategy, which enables us to maintain complete “build anything” flexibility while offering a development platform that is accessible to novice programmers.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 83 REFERENCES
Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds
TLDR
This work presents theoretical predictions and experimental results showing that, in decentralized communication networks, group estimates become reliably more accurate as a result of information exchange and shows that the dynamics of group accuracy change with network structure.
The wisdom of partisan crowds
TLDR
This work conducted two web-based experiments in which individuals answered factual questions known to elicit partisan bias before and after observing the estimates of peers in a politically homogeneous social network to find that the wisdom of crowds is robust to partisan bias.
The Wisdom of the Network: How Adaptive Networks Promote Collective Intelligence
TLDR
The results reveal that social network plasticity in the presence of feedback, can adapt to biased and changing information environments, and produce collective estimates that are more accurate than their best-performing member.
Adaptive social networks promote the wisdom of crowds
TLDR
The results reveal that, in the presence of plasticity and feedback, social networks can adapt to biased and changing information environments and produce collective estimates that are more accurate than their best-performing member.
Are We Wise About the Wisdom of Crowds? The Use of Group Judgments in Belief Revision
TLDR
Four studies examining intuitions about group wisdom and the informational influence of groups find that when provided advice, participants relied more on groups than individuals to update their beliefs, but were only modestly sensitive to group size.
The Contingent Wisdom of Dyads: When Discussion Enhances vs. Undermines the Accuracy of Collaborative Judgments
We evaluate the effect of discussion on the accuracy of collaborative judgments. In contrast to prior research, we show that discussion can either aid or impede accuracy relative to the averaging of
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect
TLDR
This work demonstrates by experimental evidence that even mild social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect in simple estimation tasks.
The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation
TLDR
An agent-based computer simulation model of information sharing in which the less successful emulate the more successful suggests that when agents are dealing with a complex problem, the more efficient the network at disseminating information, the better the short-run but the lower the long-run performance of the system.
Improving Collective Estimations Using Resistance to Social Influence
TLDR
This work obtained a statistical model of how humans change their estimation when receiving the estimates made by other individuals and used this result and the fact that each individual uses a different value of the social weight to devise a method that extracts subgroups resisting social influence.
The Power of Social Influence on Estimation Accuracy
Research shows that crowds can provide more accurate estimates of uncertain quantities than individuals (Surowiecki, 2004). But little is known about how to organize crowd members to maximize
...
...