Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.

@article{Ito1998NegativeIW,
  title={Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.},
  author={T A Ito and Jeff T. Larsen and N. Kyle Smith and John T. Cacioppo},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={1998},
  volume={75 4},
  pages={
          887-900
        }
}
Negative information tends to influence evaluations more strongly than comparably extreme positive information. To test whether this negativity bias operates at the evaluative categorization stage, the authors recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs), which are more sensitive to the evaluative categorization than the response output stage, as participants viewed positive, negative, and neutral pictures. Results revealed larger amplitude late positive brain potentials during the evaluative… 

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias
The positivity offset refers to a tendency for the positive motivational system to respond more than the negative motivation system at low levels of evaluative input. The negativity bias refers to a
The negativity bias in affective picture processing depends on top-down and bottom-up motivational significance.
TLDR
Investigation of 2 factors that could influence the detection of a negativity bias in emotional picture processing: picture-presentation paradigm and specific picture content finds that emotional images elicited larger responses in the late positive potential (LPP) than did neutral images.
Being bad isn't always good: affective context moderates the attention bias toward negative information.
TLDR
Results suggest that the attention bias to negative information is attenuated or eliminated when positive constructs are made accessible and for the self-reinforcing nature of emotional disorders.
Gender moderates valence effects on the late positive potential to emotional distracters
TLDR
These studies suggesting that attention allocation for emotional pictures of different valence is similarly moderated by gender are extended, suggesting a positivity bias for men and a negativity bias for women.
Looking at the Sunny Side of Life
TLDR
The results suggest that neural reactivity to negative images declines linearly with age, but responding to positive images is surprisingly age invariant across most of the adult life span.
Sad, thus true: negativity bias in judgments of truth
Abstract An effect observable across many different domains is that negative instances tend to be more influential than comparably positive ones. This phenomenon has been termed the negativity bias.
Neural Correlates of Processing Negative and Sexually Arousing Pictures
TLDR
The effects of orienting task on the neural correlates of processing negative and erotic pictures indicate that affective picture processing is sensitive to both stimulus-driven, and attentional or decision processes.
The role of selective attention in the positivity offset: Evidence from event related potentials
TLDR
The results suggest that the positivity offset may reflect a greater sensitivity to priming effects due to a more flexible attentional set.
Ideological reactivity: Political conservatism and brain responsivity to emotional and neutral stimuli.
TLDR
This investigation explored the relationship between political orientation and 2 event-related potentials previously shown to covary with the subjective motivational salience of stimuli-in response to photographs with standardized ratings of arousal and valence, and examined neural responses to a full range of affective stimuli.
The negativity bias is eliminated in older adults: age-related reduction in event-related brain potentials associated with evaluative categorization.
TLDR
A significant decrease in brain activity to both positive and negative stimuli is demonstrated and an elimination of the negativity bias in older adults is demonstrated.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 64 REFERENCES
Attitudes to the Right: Evaluative Processing is Associated with Lateralized Late Positive Event-Related Brain Potentials
The authors recently developed a paradigm to investigate the evaluative categorization stage of attitudes using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). The present series of studies extended this
Electrocortical Differentiation of Evaluative and Nonevaluative Categorizations
The evaluative categorizations that underlie affective and attitudinal judgments have often been equated with non-evaluative categorizations despite the central importance of evaluative processes for
Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorization: II. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of attitude registration rather than attitude report.
TLDR
It is suggested that the LPP evoked during evaluative judgments reflects attitude categorization rather than attitude report processes and can potentially assess attitudes that people are unwilling to report.
If Attitudes Affect How Stimuli Are Processed, Should They Not Affect the Event-Related Brain Potential?
In Experiment 1, subjects completed an attitude survey to identify items toward which they held positive and negative attitudes. Subsequently, subjects were instructed to count the number of positive
Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information.
  • F. Pratto, O. John
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 1991
TLDR
To test whether attentional resources are automatically directed away from an attended task to undesirable stimuli, Ss named the colors in which desirable and undesirable traits appeared, and color-naming latencies were consistently longer for undesirable traits but did not differ within the desirable and desirable categories.
Bioelectrical echoes from evaluative categorizations: I. A late positive brain potential that varies as a function of trait negativity and extremity.
TLDR
A component of the event-related potential that is associated with the first of these operations of evaluative categorization and response selection-execution is described.
Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space
  • J. Cacioppo, W. Gardner, G. Berntson
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 1997
TLDR
Evidence is reviewed showing that the positive and negative evaluative processes underlying many attitudes are distinguishable, are characterized by distinct activation functions, are related differentially to attitude ambivalence, have distinguishable antecedents, and tend to gravitate from a bivariate toward a bipolar structure when the underlying beliefs are the target of deliberation or a guide for behavior.
Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates.
Evaluative processes refer to the operations by which organisms discriminate threatening from nurturant environments. Low activation of positive and negative evaluative processes by a stimulus
The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.
TLDR
The results of 3 experiments indicated that the automatic activation effect is a pervasive and relatively unconditional phenomenon that appears that most evaluations stored in memory become active automatically on the mere presence or mention of the object in the environment.
Cross-Racial Appraisal as Related to Attitude Ambivalence and Cognitive Complexity
Previous research has suggested that Whites' evaluations of Blacks who are presented positively or negatively tend to be more extreme than evaluations of similar White targets. In Study 1, White
...
1
2
3
4
5
...