Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures

@article{Paolini2010NegativeIC,
  title={Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures},
  author={Stefania Paolini and Jake Harwood and Mark Rubin},
  journal={Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
  year={2010},
  volume={36},
  pages={1723 - 1738}
}
Drawing from the intergroup contact model and self-categorization theory, the authors advanced the novel hypothesis of a valence-salience effect, whereby negative contact causes higher category salience than positive contact. As predicted, in a laboratory experiment of interethnic contact, White Australians (N = 49) made more frequent and earlier reference to ethnicity when describing their ethnic contact partner if she had displayed negative (vs. positive, neutral) nonverbal behavior. In a two… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Intergroup Contact
TLDR
An understanding of contact that is grounded in subjective experience is established, examining the affective mediators involved in the negative contact–prejudice relationship, extending research on the effects of positive and negative contact to minority groups, and examining the contact asymmetry experimentally. Expand
Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present
Negative (vs positive) intergroup contact may have a disproportionately large impact on intergroup relations because of valence-salience effects, whereby negative contact causes higher categoryExpand
When contact goes wrong: Negative intergroup contact promotes generalized outgroup avoidance
This paper broadens our understanding of the consequences of negative intergroup contact. Study 1 reports cross-sectional evidence that negative contact with European immigrants in Britain is notExpand
Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice
Research on intergroup contact suggests that contact relates more strongly to affective than cognitive dimensions of prejudice. However, work on these forms of prejudice focuses primarily on positiveExpand
Positive and negative intergroup contact: Interaction not asymmetry
This research reports a novel investigation into the comparative effects of positive and negative direct and extended intergroup contact on intergroup orientations. It tested the generality of theExpand
Intergroup Contact and Social Change
TLDR
Investigation of the effects of negative as well as positive intergroup contact found that only negative contact predicted LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender) students’ collective action intentions longitudinally while only positive contact predicted heterosexual/cisgender students' LGBT activism. Expand
The Contact Caveat
TLDR
Negative contact may be more strongly associated with increased racism and discrimination than positive contact is with its reduction, and the contact hypothesis is extended by issuing an important caveat. Expand
Effects of Past and Present Intergroup Communication on Perceived Fit of an Outgroup Member and Desire for Future Intergroup Contact
TLDR
A positive older partner perceived as fitting the category “older people” resulted in greater intention to communicate with older people in the future than a negative partner; individuals who saw their partner as atypical showed the reverse pattern—they were less likely to report intentions for future intergenerational contact after a positive than anegative manipulated interaction. Expand
Negative Intergroup Contact and Radical Right‐Wing Voting: The Moderating Roles of Personal and Collective Self‐Efficacy
This study examines whether negative contact with immigrants promotes voting for radical right‐wing parties, to what extent this relationship can be explained by feelings of outgroup threat, andExpand
What Makes People Imagine Themselves in Contact with Outgroup Members: Exploring the Relationship between Vicarious Media Contact Experiences and Imagined Contact
We explored whether mediated intergroup contact might stimulate other forms of intergroup contact. Our study compared two forms of mediated contact: vicarious intergroup contact (exposure to anExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 56 REFERENCES
Intergroup contact theory.
  • T. Pettigrew
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Annual review of psychology
  • 1998
TLDR
The chapter proposes four processes: learning about the outgroup, changed behavior, affective ties, and ingroup reappraisal, and distinguishes between essential and facilitating factors, and emphasizes different outcomes for different stages of contact. Expand
Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience
Two studies investigated intergroup contact with immigrants in Italy. In Study 1 (N = 310 students) contact had direct positive effects on perceived out-group variability and out-group attitude, andExpand
Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact.
TLDR
The authors discuss empirical research supporting the imagined contact proposition and find it to be an approach that is at once deceptively simple and remarkably effective in encouraging more positive intergroup relations. Expand
Grandparent-Grandchild Contact and Attitudes Toward Older Adults: Moderator and Mediator Effects
TLDR
Modated mediational analysis indicated that the moderating effect of group salience occurs between quality of contact and the mediators, not between the mediator and attitudes. Expand
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
TLDR
The meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice, and this result suggests that contact theory, devised originally for racial and ethnic encounters, can be extended to other groups. Expand
Categorization and intergroup anxiety in contact between British and Japanese nationals
Two studies examined the relationship between categorization, intergroup anxiety and intergroup attitudes (intergroup bias and negative affect). Study 1 consisted of a survey of 236 British andExpand
The Antecedents and Implications of Interracial Anxiety
TLDR
A model of the antecedents and implications of intergroup anxiety is offered and it is argued that a lack of positive previous experiences with outgroup members creates negative expectancies about interracial interactions, which result in inter group anxiety. Expand
The Family and Communication Dynamics of Group Salience
Group salience is a key variable both in influencing quality of intergroup contact and in moderating the effects of intergroup contact on prejudicial attitudes. Two studies uncovered theExpand
Shared Family Identity, Age Salience, and Intergroup Contact: Investigation of the Grandparent–Grandchild Relationship
This study investigated communicative and relational aspects of the grandparent–grandchild relationship that lead to perceptions of age salience and shared family identity with the grandparent. TheExpand
I Thought We Could Be Friends, but …
TLDR
The hypothesis that lack of intergroup contact experience sets the stage for mis-communications regarding friendship interest is supported, suggesting that signal amplification triggers defensive distancing and ultimately lowers the likelihood of cross-group friendship formation. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...