Neandertals and moderns mixed, and it matters

@article{Zilho2006NeandertalsAM,
  title={Neandertals and moderns mixed, and it matters},
  author={J. Zilh{\~a}o},
  journal={Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues},
  year={2006},
  volume={15}
}
  • J. Zilhão
  • Published 2006
  • Biology
  • Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues
Twenty‐five years ago, the Middle‐to‐Upper Paleolithic transition in Europe could be represented as a straightforward process subsuming both the emergence of symbolic behavior and the replacement of Neandertals by modern humans. The Aurignacian was a proxy for the latter, during which enhanced cognitive capabilities explained ornaments and art. The few instances of Neandertal symbolism were deemed to long postdate contact and dismissed as “imitation without understanding,” if not geological… Expand
A Tale of Two Species: The Origins of Art and the Neanderthal Challenge
Abstract At the dawn of the Upper Palaeolithic era around 45,000 BP, Homo sapiens migrated into Europe. This process was accompanied by the extinction of Neanderthals, which has led many to believeExpand
Personal Ornaments and Symbolism Among the Neanderthals
TLDR
Results from the sequencing of the Neanderthal genome brought palaeogenetics in line with the human palaeontological evidence for extensive Neanderthal/modern admixture at the time of contact, thus removing the rationale for thinking about Neanderthals as a different species altogether. Expand
Neandertal-Modern Human Contact in Western Eurasia: Issues of Dating, Taxonomy, and Cultural Associations
Supporting Assimilation views of Neandertal/modern human interaction, chronostratigraphic reasoning indicates that the “transitional” industries of Europe predate modern human immigration, inExpand
Revolution or evolution: the emergence of the Upper Paleolithic in Europe
Abstract The emergence of the Upper Paleolithic is traditionally envisioned in terms of a clear rupture with the Middle Paleolithic. From this perspective, the Aurignacian is interpreted as theExpand
The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in Northern Europe: the Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician and the issue of acculturation of the last Neanderthals
Abstract During the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition, a technocomplex known as the Lincombian-Ranisian-Jerzmanowician (LRJ), characterized by the presence of leaf-points made from blades, wasExpand
Neandertals revised
TLDR
Genetic evidence and archeological data show that the biological and cultural gaps between these populations were probably smaller than previously thought, and falsify inferences that Neandertals were outliers in terms of behavioral complexity in Africa. Expand
The Emergence of Ornaments and Art: An Archaeological Perspective on the Origins of “Behavioral Modernity”
The earliest known personal ornaments come from the Middle Stone Age of southern Africa, c. 75,000 years ago, and are associated with anatomically modern humans. In Europe, such items are notExpand
Did Neandertals and anatomically modern humans coexist in northern Italy during the late MIS 3
The main processes invoked to explain the demise of Homo neanderthalensis are the effects of adverse climatic conditions in the northern hemisphere during Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3) and theExpand
European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals
  • E. Trinkaus
  • Medicine, Biology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2007
TLDR
The ubiquitous and variable presence of these morphological features in the European earlier modern human samples can only be parsimoniously explained as a product of modest levels of assimilation of Neandertals into early modern human populations as the latter dispersed across Europe. Expand
Pego do Diabo (Loures, Portugal): Dating the Emergence of Anatomical Modernity in Westernmost Eurasia
TLDR
These findings have implications for the understanding of the emergence of anatomical modernity in the Old World as a whole, support explanations of the archaic features of the Lagar Velho child's anatomy that invoke evolutionarily significant Neandertal/modern admixture at the time of contact, and counter suggestions that NeandERTals could have survived in southwest Iberia until as late as the Last Glacial Maximum. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 118 REFERENCES
A late Neanderthal associated with Upper Palaeolithic artefacts
TLDR
The evidence supports the hypothesis of a long term coexistence with technocultural interactions between the first modern humans and the last Neanderthals in Europe and argues against phylogenetic continuity between the two populations in this region. Expand
The Chronology and Taphonomy of the Earliest Aurignacian and Its Implications for the Understanding of Neandertal Extinction
The view that the Châtelperronian is the acculturation of late Neandertals brought about by contact with nearby moderns assumes an age of ca. 40,000 years ago for the earliest Aurignacian. However,Expand
Neanderthal Acculturation in Western Europe? A Critical Review of the Evidence and Its Interpretation1
The presence of bone tools, personal ornaments, and apparently “modern” stone tools in European late Middle Paleolithic or pre‐Aurignacian Paleolithic contexts is generally interpreted as the resultExpand
Hominids and hybrids: the place of Neanderthals in human evolution.
  • I. Tattersall, J. Schwartz
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 1999
TLDR
Although many students of human evolution have lately begun to look favorably on the view that these distinctive hominids merit species recognition in their own right as Homo neanderthalensis, at least as many still regard them as no more than a strange variant of the authors' own species, Homo sapiens. Expand
Makers of the early Aurignacian of Europe.
TLDR
The overall picture is one of an extended period of cultural contact, involving some degree of genetic exchange, between Neandertals and early modern Europeans, and perhaps for 8,000-10,000 years or longer. Expand
Whither the Neanderthals?
Thousands of Neanderthal fossils and artifacts are known, making Neanderthals the best-characterized fossil humans. It is becoming increasingly clear that the Neanderthals and their modern humanExpand
Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neandertals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans
TLDR
Following the most stringent current standards for validation of ancient DNA sequences, it is shown that the mtDNAs of two anatomically modern Homo sapiens sapiens individuals of the Cro-Magnon type dated at about 23 and 25 thousand years ago fall well within the range of variation of today's humans, but differ sharply from the available sequences of the chronologically closer Neandertals. Expand
Genes, Fossils, and Culture. An Overview of the Evidence for Neandertal–Modern Human Interaction and Admixture
  • J. Zilhão
  • Geography
  • Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
  • 2006
This paper re-examines current arguments concerning the evidence for Neandertal-modern human interaction and admixture. While most researchers now agree that the ancestry of all present day humansExpand
An Aurignacian «Garden of Eden» in southern Germany ? An alternative interpretation of the Geissenklösterle and a critique of the Kulturpumpe model
New radiocarbon dates and results of new analyses from Geissenklosterle (Conard and Bolus JHE, 40: 331-71) were recently used to suggest that the Aurignacian of the Swabian Jura dates back to 40 kaExpand
Early Modern Humans
AbstractPerceptions of the emergence and spread of modern humans have changed recently through the reanalysis of fossils, an improved geochronological framework, and the discovery of a few specimens.Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...