Nature and Consequences of Halo Error : A Critical Analysis
@article{Murphy1993NatureAC, title={Nature and Consequences of Halo Error : A Critical Analysis}, author={K. Murphy and Robert A. Jako and Rebecca L. Anhalt}, journal={Journal of Applied Psychology}, year={1993}, volume={78}, pages={218-225} }
The definition of halo error that dominated researchers' thinking for most of this century implied that (a) halo error was common; (b) it was a rater error, with true and illusory components; (c) it led to inflated correlations among rating dimensions and was due to the influence of a general evaluation on specific judgments; and (d) it had negative consequences and should be avoided or removed. We review research showing that all of the major elements of this conception of halo are either… Expand
257 Citations
Rater bias in psychological research: when is it a problem and what can we do about it?
- Psychology
- 2000
- 166
The role of arousal in the creation and control of the halo effect in attitude models
- Psychology
- 1996
- 80
Response distortions in self-reported and other-reported measures: Is there light at the end of the tunnel?
- Psychology
- 2016
- 5
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 84 REFERENCES
The Systematic Distortion Hypothesis, Halo, and Accuracy: An Individual-Level Analysis
- Psychology
- 1987
- 75
- Highly Influential
Errors and mistakes: evaluating the accuracy of social judgment.
- Medicine, Psychology
- Psychological bulletin
- 1987
- 817
- PDF
Implications of Three Causal Models for the Measurement of Halo Error
- Psychology
- 1990
- 63
- Highly Influential
- PDF
The consequences of halo "error" in performance ratings: A field study of the moderating effect of halo on test validation results.
- Psychology
- 1990
- 47