Natural language and natural selection

@article{Pinker1990NaturalLA,
  title={Natural language and natural selection},
  author={S. Pinker and P. Bloom},
  journal={Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
  year={1990},
  volume={13},
  pages={707-727}
}
Many people have argued that the evolution of the human language faculty cannot be explained by Darwinian natural selection. Chomsky and Gould have suggested that language may have evolved as the by-product of selection for other abilities or as a consequence of as-yet unknown laws of growth and form. Others have argued that a biological specialization for grammar is incompatible with every tenet of Darwinian theory – that it shows no genetic variation, could not exist in any intermediate forms… Expand
The Adaptive Significance of Human Language
Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution
Evolution as a constraint on theories of syntax : the Case against Minimalism
Language as shaped by the brain.
Sexual selection for syntax and kin selection for semantics: problems and prospects
The Concept of Evolution in Linguistics
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 369 REFERENCES
Parsing Efficiency, Binding, C-Command and Learnability
INTERACTIVE MODELS FOR EVOLUTION: NEURAL MECHANISMS, ANATOMY, AND BEHAVIOR
The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition
Linguistic theory and psychological reality
Explaining language universals
Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory
Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology
Formal Principles of Language Acquisition
...
1
2
3
4
5
...