Narcissistic personality disorder in DSM-5.

@article{Skodol2014NarcissisticPD,
  title={Narcissistic personality disorder in DSM-5.},
  author={A. Skodol and D. Bender and L. Morey},
  journal={Personality disorders},
  year={2014},
  volume={5 4},
  pages={
          422-7
        }
}
The criteria for personality disorders in Section II of DSM-5 have not changed from those in DSM-IV. Therefore, the diagnosis of Section II narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) will perpetuate all of the well-enumerated shortcomings associated with the diagnosis since DSM-III. In this article, we will briefly review problems associated with Section II NPD and then discuss the evolution of a new model of personality disorder and the place in the model of pathological narcissism and NPD. The… Expand
Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Are Psychodynamic Theories and the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders Finally Going to Meet?
TLDR
The narcissist's unique pattern of self-impairments in identity and self-direction, and of interpersonal disfunctioning, is discussed, and how contemporary psychodynamic theories and the hierarchical model of Pincus and Lukowitsky additionally inform or contradict the AMPD is examined. Expand
Narcissistic Personality Disorder: An Integrative Review of Recent Empirical Data and Current Definitions
TLDR
This review summarized available empirical data on NPD and related these findings to current definitions of NPD, as defined in the DSM-5, followed the five steps to establishing diagnostic validity proposed by Robins and Guze. Expand
Relating DSM-5 section III personality traits to section II personality disorder diagnoses
TLDR
Although the DSM-5 section III alternative model provided a substantially different taxonomic structure for personality disorders, the associations between this new approach and the traditional personality disorder concepts in DSM- 5 section II make it possible to render traditional personality Disorder concepts using alternative model traits in combination with core impairments in personality functioning. Expand
Changes in the Conceptualization of Personality Disorder: The DSM-5 Debacle
Lanier, Bollinger, and Krueger (2011) provide an overview of proposed changes to the diagnosis and classification of personality disorders to appear in the forthcoming fifth edition of the AmericanExpand
DSM-5 section III personality traits and section II personality disorders in a Flemish community sample
TLDR
This study examined the factor structure and reliability of the PID-5 in a Flemish community sample and investigated the predictive ability of section III personality traits in relation to section II personality disorders through correlations and stepwise regression analyses, revealing a five factor solution. Expand
Borderline Personality Disorder and Narcissistic Personality Disorder Diagnoses From the Perspective of the DSM-5 Personality Traits: A Study on Italian Clinical Participants
TLDR
Separation insecurity, impulsivity, distractibility, and perceptual dysregulation were the DSM-5 traits that significantly discriminated BPD participants, and domain-level analyses confirmed and extended trait-level findings. Expand
Retention or deletion of personality disorder diagnoses for DSM-5: an expert consensus approach.
TLDR
Surveyed members of two personality disorder associations with respect to the utility, validity, and status of each DSM-IV-TR personality disorder diagnosis indicated that the proposal to delete five of the personality disorders lacks consensus support within the personality disorder community. Expand
Proposed DSM-5 personality traits and substance use: A multi-faceted study
In this study, the Brief Assessment of Traits 37 (BAT37) was developed to measure the presence of the personality traits initially proposed for inclusion in the personality disorders section of theExpand
Personality disorders : toward theoretical and empirical integration in diagnosis and assessment
What are personality disorders? How should they be conceptualized, and how should they be assessed and diagnosed in clinical practice? For over a century these questions have been at the heart ofExpand
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Narcissism
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder that involves a long-term pattern of abnormal behavior characterized by exaggerated feelings of selfimportance, an excessive need forExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 44 REFERENCES
Narcissistic pathology as core personality dysfunction: comparing the DSM-IV and the DSM-5 proposal for narcissistic personality disorder.
TLDR
A revised formulation of narcissistic personality is described, and a case study is presented that illustrates the similarities and differences in the DSM-IV and proposed DSM-5 portrayal of narcissistic issues and related clinical problems over the course of a particular treatment. Expand
Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism and the DSM–5 Pathological Personality Trait Model
TLDR
The Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID5) captured a significant portion of the variance in grandiose and vulnerable factors, although the 2 specific facets designated for the assessment of NPD fared substantially better in the Assessment ofgrandiose rather than vulnerable narcissism. Expand
Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder.
TLDR
Criterion issues must be resolved, including clarification of the nature of normal and pathological narcissism, incorporation of the two broad phenotypic themes of narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability into revised diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments, and elimination of references to overt and covert narcissism that reify these modes of expression as distinct narcissistic types. Expand
DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders.
TLDR
Regression analyses support the DSM-5 hybrid model in that pathological traits, and an indicator of general personality pathology severity provided incremental information about PDs. Expand
Debates on the Narcissism Conundrum: Trait, Domain, Dimension, Type, or Disorder?
TLDR
It is concluded that NPD as such shows nosological inconsistency and that its consideration as a trait domain with needed further research would be strongly beneficial to the field. Expand
Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5.
TLDR
Modifications in approach to diagnosing PD types and their justifications--including excessive co-morbidity among DSM-IV-TR PDs, limited validity for some existing types, lack of specificity in the definition of PD, instability of current PD criteria sets, and arbitrary diagnostic thresholds--are the subjects of this review. Expand
Synthesizing dimensional and categorical approaches to personality disorders: refining the research agenda for DSM‐V Axis II
TLDR
The idea of having a set of core descriptive elements of personality for DSM‐V, an approach to rating those elements for specific patients, a way of combining those elements into personality disorder prototypes, and a revised conception of personality disorder as a construct separate from personality traits are discussed. Expand
Narcissism at the crossroads: phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis.
TLDR
It is concluded that the construct of pathological narcissism is at a crossroads and recommendations for diagnostic assessment, clinical conceptualization, and future research that could lead to a more integrated understanding of narcissistic personality and narcissistic personality pathology are provided. Expand
Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-year follow-up
TLDR
Compared with previous findings, approaches that integrate normative traits and personality pathology proved to be most predictive, as the SNAP, a system that integrates normal and pathological traits, generally showed the largest validity coefficients overall. Expand
The cooccurrence of DSM-III-R personality disorders.
TLDR
The Structured Interview for Diagnosis of Personality-Revised, a semistructured instrument designed to yield reliable personality disorder diagnoses, was used to evaluate 1116 subjects for the presence of DSM-III-R personality disorders and there was a high degree of cooccurrence. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...