Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?

@article{Macnaghten2005NanotechnologyGA,
  title={Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?},
  author={Phil Macnaghten and Matthew Kearnes and Brian Wynne},
  journal={Science Communication},
  year={2005},
  volume={27},
  pages={268 - 291}
}
In this article we argue that nanotechnology represents an extraordinary opportunity to build in a robust role for the social sciences in a technology that remains at an early, and hence undetermined, stage of development. We examine policy dynamics in both the United States and United Kingdom aimed at both opening up, and closing down, the role of the social sciences in nanotechnologies. We then set out a prospective agenda for the social sciences and its potential in the future shaping of… 
Nanotechnology and Public Engagement: A New Kind of (Social) Science?
Nanotechnology is often framed as revolutionary, both within science and in the effects it will have on our lives. Increasingly, the relationship between nanotechnology and society is cast as a
Framing the Discussion: Nanotechnology and the Social Construction of Technology--What STS Scholars Are Saying
The emergence of nanotechnology, with all its promises of economic, social, and medical benefits, along with dire predictions of environmental, health, and safety threats, has occasioned an active
The Future of Science Governance: Publics, Policies, Practices
In this paper we develop new insights on science governance at a time when an emphasis on public engagement in responding to questions of trust in science is giving way to a more systemic and
Nanotechnology, Risk and Upstream Public Engagement
This article examines the troubling relationship between emerging technologies, the uncertain and intensifying character of technological risk, and public concerns. It argues that serious gaps,
Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology
TLDR
The role of plausibility in anticipatory governance is articulated, which raises methodological questions as to who are relevant stakeholders and how to activate different communities so as to engage the far future.
On Nanotechnology and Ambivalence: The Politics of Enthusiasm
The promise of scientific and technological innovation – particularly in fields such as nanotechnology – is increasingly set against what has been articulated as a deficit in public trust in both the
The Laboratory Revisited
UK science policy now includes ‘upstream public engagement’ as an element in the responsible development of nanotechnology. This paper explores different understandings of the term upstream
Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making: Narrative Structures, Public Responses, and Emerging Nanotechnologies
In this paper I engage with debates on technoscientific governance, narrative, and emergent public attitudes. Building on a piece of social research addressing public responses to the social and
Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom
This paper offers a comparative analysis of two public engagement exercises, conducted concurrently in the UK and Brazil. Following an account of how public engagement is situated in the political
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 89 REFERENCES
The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology
A recent study at the University of Sheffield (UK) investigates the social and economic challenges of nanotechnology. In the project, social and natural scientists worked together to provide a
Too Little, Too Late? Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States
‘Nanotechnology’ is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, and despite ongoing disagreements about how ‘nanotechnology’ ought to be defined, narratives emerging from a diversity of sources share the
See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream
Spurred on by controversies over BSE, GM crops and nanotechnology, scientists gradually started to involve the public in their work. They looked first to education as the answer, then to processes of
Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change
Technology is everywhere, yet a theory of technology and its social dimension remains to be fully developed. Building on the influential book The Social Construction of Technological Systems, this
Another knowledge is possible : beyond northern epistemologies
"Another Knowledge Is Possible" explores the struggles against moral and cultural imperialism and neoliberal globalization that have taken place over the past few decades, and the alternatives that
The risk management of everything: rethinking the politics of uncertainty
TLDR
This work is free to download, save, perform or distribute this work electronically or in any other format subject to the conditions set out in the Demos open access licence, which you can read at the back of this publication.
Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy
Introduction: What Is to Be Done with Political Ecology? 1. Why Political Ecology Has to Let Go of Nature First, Get Out of the Cave Ecological Crisis or Crisis of Objectivity? The End of Nature The
The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other
The need for an integrated social constructivist approach towards the study of science and technology is outlined. Within such a programme both scientific facts and technological artefacts are to be
Unruly Technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding
This paper examines technologies as rule-following behaviour, arguing that emerging practices define `rules', rather than rules controlling practices. With the aid of several examples, it suggests
...
...