Naming elements after scientists: an account of a controversy

@article{RaynerCanham2008NamingEA,
  title={Naming elements after scientists: an account of a controversy},
  author={G. Rayner-Canham and Zheng Zheng},
  journal={Foundations of Chemistry},
  year={2008},
  volume={10},
  pages={13-18}
}
Over the last two hundred years, there have been many occasions where the name of a newly-discovered element has provoked controversy and dissent but in modern times, the naming of elements after scientists has proved to be particularly contentious. Here we recount the threads of this story, predominantly through discourses in the popular scientific journals, the first major discussion on naming an element after a scientist (Moseley); the first definitive naming after a scientist (Curie); and… Expand
On Element Discoveries
While there is little ambiguity in the definition of a chemical element, it is far from evident what it means to have discovered a new element and what the criteria for discovery are. In theExpand
The Forgotten Names of Chemical Elements
Chemical elements are the bricks with which Chemistry is build. Their names had a history, but part of it is forgotten or barely known. In this article the forgotten, no more used, never used, andExpand
The Transfermium Wars
With the rival discovery claims in the early 1970 of the first transactinide elements, numbers 104 and 105 in the periodic table, the situation with regard to official recognition of new elementsExpand
Another four bricks in the wall.
TLDR
This group of periodic table experts attempts to read the tea leaves and predict the names for elements 113, 115, 117 and 118. Expand
Evolution of the periodic table through the synthesis of new elements
Abstract This brief introduction to the synthesis and chemistry of elements discovered since 1940 is focused primarily on Z=93–118. The goal of this work is not to simply catalogue the nuclear fusionExpand
What's so improper about fractions? Prescriptivism and language socialization at Math Corps
Abstract Mathematical prescriptivism is a language ideology found in school mathematics that uses a discourse of rationality to proscribe language forms perceived as illogical or inefficient. TheExpand
Structural Evolution, Vibrational Signatures and Energetics of Niobium Clusters from Nb 2 to Nb 20
A comprehensive review on geometric and electronic structures, spectroscopic and energetic properties of small niobium clusters in the range from two to twenty atoms, Nbn, n = 2–20, in threeExpand
RETRACTED: Period 5
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
Paneth, IUPAC, and the Naming of Elements
The procedure for assigning names to elements by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry involves establishing priority of discovery, then inviting the discoverers to suggest a name.Expand
Shuffling Of Heavy-Element Names by IUPAC Panel Provokes Outcries: ▄ Controversy centers on rejection of two names—seaborgium and hassium, which are dear to U.S. and German scientists
The International Union of Pure & Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) has a hot potato on its hands. On Aug. 31, an IUPAC-sponsored panel of chemists who work outside the esoteric field of heavy-elementExpand
HEAVIEST ELEMENTS NAMED: IUPAC rejects 'seaborgium' for element 106
In a surprise move, the International Union of Pure & Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) has revealed much sooner than expected its recommendations for naming elements 101 to 109. And some of its choices areExpand
The Making of the Missing Chemical Elements
ALMOST five years ago, in a lecture to the Institute of Chemistry in London, the success that radioactive methods had achieved in the task of completing the Periodic System was described1. In theExpand
From masurium to trinacrium: The troubled story of element 43
The first man-made chemical element was that with atomic number 43. It was produced at the University of Californiaâ€sA„A¬Berkeley (by neutron bombardment of a molybdenum plate and was chemicallyExpand
HEAVY-ELEMENT NOMENCLATURE ACS panel rejects names chosen by IUPAC
An American Chemical Society committee has thrown down the gauntlet, rejecting the names for elements 104 to 108 reccommended by the International Union of Pure & Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). The ACSExpand
Discovery of the transfermium elements
Abstract In 1985 IUPAP and IUPAC decided to establish a Transfermium Working Group to consider questions of priority in the discovery of elements with nuclear charge number Z>;100. The membership ofExpand
Heavy-element name saga ends
...
1
2
...