Nagarjuna and the Limits of Thought

  title={Nagarjuna and the Limits of Thought},
  author={Jay L. Garfield and Graham Priest},
  journal={Philosophy East and West},
  pages={1 - 21}
Nagarjuna seems willing to embrace contradictions while at the same time making use of classic reductio arguments. He asserts that he rejects all philosophical views including his own-that he asserts nothing-and appears to mean it. It is argued here that he, like many philosophers in the West and, indeed, like many of his Buddhist colleagues, discovers and explores true contradictions arising at the limits of thought. For those who share a dialetheist's comfort with the possibility of true… 

Figures from this paper

Wittgenstein, Nāgārjuna and relational quantum mechanics

  • M. Peters
  • Philosophy, Art
    Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 2022
i have a distaste for that form of criticism that dismisses one discipline, theory or thinker from the perspective of another discipline. the arrogance of this position is distasteful and seemingly

Dialetheism, Paradox, and Nāgārjuna’s Way of Thinking

  • R. Jones
  • Philosophy
    Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal of Constructive Engagement of Distinct Approaches toward World Philosophy
  • 2018
Nāgārjuna’s doctrine of emptiness, his ideas on “two truths” and language, and his general method of arguing are presented clearly by him and can be stated without paradox. That the dialetheists

On Nāgārjuna’s Ontological and Semantic Paradox

Garfield and Priest have rationally reconstructed Nāgārjuna’s doctrine of emptiness as an endorsement of the contradictory nature of reality. According to them, Nāgārjuna can be seen to argue that

How We Think Mādhyamikas Think: A Response To Tom Tillemans

Tillemans argues, centrally, that the paradoxes of emptiness that we take to be found in Nāgārjuna are best interpreted in a consistent fashion. In our response we take issue with this, arguing that

Contradictions in Dōgen

In "The Way of the Dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism," Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest argue that some (though not all) of the contradictions that appear in Buddhist texts


  • Gary Ebbs
  • Philosophy, Psychology
    A Theory of Truthmaking
  • 2019
This is what many philosophers believe today about the analytic/synthetic distinction: In his classic early writings on analyticity in particular, in “Truth by convention” “Two dogmas of empiricism”

Apophatic Language, the Aesthetic, and the Sensus Divinitatis

Across a variety of religious and philosophical traditions, it is common to think that it is possible that God defies all description. This presents a problem, however, as the claim that God defies

Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna

Graham Priest in collaboration with J. Garfield and Y. Deguchi (henceforth: DGP) wrote several articles and responses arguing that the Buddhist philosopher Nāgārjuna was a dialetheist thinker, i.e.

arjuna: Master of Paradox, Mystic or Perpetrator of Fallacies?

Nāgārjuna may perplex and often infuriate, and while his textsmay initially defy exegesis, anyonewho spends any timewith NāgârJuna’s thought inevitably develops a deep respect for this master philosopher.

Evidence of Hindu Religion on the Theory of Chomsky's Transformational Grammar

The purpose of this paper is to broaden the links to Noam Chomsky, the American linguist in order to show that he is not only a product of his own professors or immediate surroundings, nor from links



Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus first appeared in 1921 and was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951) published during his lifetime. Written in short, carefully numbered

Dependent Arising and the Emptiness of Emptiness: Why Did Nagarjuna Start with Causation?

Nagarjuna, who lived in South India in approximately the first century C.E., is undoubtedly the most important, influential, and widely studied Mahayana Buddhist philosopher. He is the founder of the

The dialectical method of Nāgārjuna : Vigrahavyāvartanī

Though only a minor work in form, as regards its contents the Vigrahavyavartani is a fundamental text of Madhyamaka, as well as of the early indian dialectical tradition. Written after Nagarjuna, the

Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy

Introduction: Proposition and World Richard Gaskin 1. Frege and the grammar of truth Richard Mendelsohn 2. Categories, constructions and congruence: Husserl's tactics of meaning Peter Simons 3.

Some Logical Aspects of Nagarjuna's System

THE MADHYAMIKA SCHOOL, founded by NSigrjuna (2nd century A.D. ), has been known to modern scholarship since the time of Emile Burnouf, over a century ago. During the past six decades, it has been

The Emptiness of Emptiness: An Introduction to Early Indian Mādhyamika@@@The Emptiness of Emptiness: An Introduction to Early Indian Madhyamika

The Madhyamika or middle way, a school of Buddhist thought that originated in India in the second century, was a decisive influence on the subsequent development of Mahayana Buddhism. In a new

Nagarjunian Disputations: A Philosophical Journey Through An Indian Looking-Glass

This is a defense of the earlier, nihilist interpretation (NI) of the Madhyamaka against some of the leading non-nihilist interpretations (NNI) that have arisen to challenge it in recent times.

The Central Philosophy of Buddhism : A Study of the Madhyamika System

* The Two Traditions in Indian Philosophy * The "Silence" of the Buddha and the Beginnings of the Dialectic * Development of the Two Traditions and the Emergence of the Mahyamika System * The

The fundamental wisdom of the middle way : Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā

BLA new translation from the Tibetan, with a verse-by-verse philosophical commentary in English Mulamadhyamakakarika is the foundational text for all Mahayana Buddhism and is one of the most

Zen Action / Zen Person. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press

  • Zen Action / Zen Person. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press
  • 1989