Nagarjuna and the Limits of Thought

  title={Nagarjuna and the Limits of Thought},
  author={Jay L. Garfield and Jay L. Graham Priest},
  journal={Philosophy East and West},
  pages={1 - 21}
Nagarjuna seems willing to embrace contradictions while at the same time making use of classic reductio arguments. He asserts that he rejects all philosophical views including his own-that he asserts nothing-and appears to mean it. It is argued here that he, like many philosophers in the West and, indeed, like many of his Buddhist colleagues, discovers and explores true contradictions arising at the limits of thought. For those who share a dialetheist's comfort with the possibility of true… Expand

Figures from this paper

Dialetheism, Paradox, and Nāgārjuna’s Way of Thinking
Nāgārjuna’s doctrine of emptiness, his ideas on “two truths” and language, and his general method of arguing are presented clearly by him and can be stated without paradox. That the dialetheistsExpand
On Nāgārjuna’s Ontological and Semantic Paradox
Garfield and Priest have rationally reconstructed Nāgārjuna’s doctrine of emptiness as an endorsement of the contradictory nature of reality. According to them, Nāgārjuna can be seen to argue thatExpand
How We Think Mādhyamikas Think: A Response To Tom Tillemans
Tillemans argues, centrally, that the paradoxes of emptiness that we take to be found in Nāgārjuna are best interpreted in a consistent fashion. In our response we take issue with this, arguing thatExpand
Contradictions in Dōgen
In "The Way of the Dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism," Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest argue that some (though not all) of the contradictions that appear in Buddhist textsExpand
Apophatic Language, the Aesthetic, and the Sensus Divinitatis
Across a variety of religious and philosophical traditions, it is common to think that it is possible that God defies all description. This presents a problem, however, as the claim that God defiesExpand
Some (critical) remarks on Priest’s dialetheist reading of Nagarjuna
Graham Priest in collaboration with J. Garfield and Y. Deguchi (henceforth: DGP) wrote several articles and responses arguing that the Buddhist philosopher Nāgārjuna was a dialetheist thinker, i.e.Expand
arjuna: Master of Paradox, Mystic or Perpetrator of Fallacies?
Nāgārjuna may perplex and often infuriate, and while his textsmay initially defy exegesis, anyonewho spends any timewith NāgârJuna’s thought inevitably develops a deep respect for this master philosopher. Expand
Evidence of Hindu Religion on the Theory of Chomsky's Transformational Grammar
The purpose of this paper is to broaden the links to Noam Chomsky, the American linguist in order to show that he is not only a product of his own professors or immediate surroundings, nor from linksExpand
The Positionless Middle Way: Weak Philosophical Deflationism in Madhyamaka
In this paper, I explore the connections between meta-ontological and meta-philosophical issues in two of Nāgārjuna’s primary works, the Mūlamadhyamakārikā and the Vigrahavyāvartanī. I argue for anExpand
The Dependent Origination of Skepticism in Classical India: An Experiment in Cross-Cultural Philosophy
I begin with the question of whether the problem of philosophical skepticism is inevitable, a question that was answered affirmatively by Hume and has come to be a source of debate in contemporaryExpand


Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
The Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus first appeared in 1921 and was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951) published during his lifetime. Written in short, carefully numberedExpand
Dependent Arising and the Emptiness of Emptiness: Why Did Nagarjuna Start with Causation?
Nagarjuna, who lived in South India in approximately the first century C.E., is undoubtedly the most important, influential, and widely studied Mahayana Buddhist philosopher. He is the founder of theExpand
The dialectical method of Nāgārjuna : Vigrahavyāvartanī
Though only a minor work in form, as regards its contents the Vigrahavyavartani is a fundamental text of Madhyamaka, as well as of the early indian dialectical tradition. Written after Nagarjuna, theExpand
Grammar in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy
Introduction: Proposition and World Richard Gaskin 1. Frege and the grammar of truth Richard Mendelsohn 2. Categories, constructions and congruence: Husserl's tactics of meaning Peter Simons 3.Expand
Some Logical Aspects of Nagarjuna's System
THE MADHYAMIKA SCHOOL, founded by NSigrjuna (2nd century A.D. ), has been known to modern scholarship since the time of Emile Burnouf, over a century ago. During the past six decades, it has beenExpand
The Emptiness of Emptiness: An Introduction to Early Indian Mādhyamika@@@The Emptiness of Emptiness: An Introduction to Early Indian Madhyamika
The Madhyamika or middle way, a school of Buddhist thought that originated in India in the second century, was a decisive influence on the subsequent development of Mahayana Buddhism. In a newExpand
Nāgārjuna's appeal
Deux caracteristiques de la philosophie de Nāgārjuna ont retenu l'attention de l'A. Ses ecrits philosophiques ont fascine un grand nombre de savants ce qui demande des explications. Dans un secondExpand
Nagarjunian Disputations: A Philosophical Journey Through An Indian Looking-Glass
This is a defense of the earlier, nihilist interpretation (NI) of the Madhyamaka against some of the leading non-nihilist interpretations (NNI) that have arisen to challenge it in recent times.
The Central Philosophy of Buddhism : A Study of the Madhyamika System
* The Two Traditions in Indian Philosophy * The "Silence" of the Buddha and the Beginnings of the Dialectic * Development of the Two Traditions and the Emergence of the Mahyamika System * TheExpand
The fundamental wisdom of the middle way : Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā
BLA new translation from the Tibetan, with a verse-by-verse philosophical commentary in English Mulamadhyamakakarika is the foundational text for all Mahayana Buddhism and is one of the mostExpand