NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax

  title={NASA Faked the Moon Landing—Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax},
  author={Stephan Lewandowsky and Klaus Oberauer and Gilles E. Gignac},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  pages={622 - 633}
Although nearly all domain experts agree that carbon dioxide emissions are altering the world’s climate, segments of the public remain unconvinced by the scientific evidence. Internet blogs have become a platform for denial of climate change, and bloggers have taken a prominent role in questioning climate science. We report a survey of climate-blog visitors to identify the variables underlying acceptance and rejection of climate science. Our findings parallel those of previous work and show… Expand
The Robust Relationship Between Conspiracism and Denial of (Climate) Science
Dixon and Jones’s core argument is that the relationship between the two variables of interest, conspiracist ideation and acceptance of climate change (CLIM), is nonlinear, and that the models reported for both surveys were misspecified. Expand
The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism
This work suggests that people who reject the fact that the Earth’s climate is changing due to greenhouse gas emissions (or any other body of well-established scientific knowledge) oppose whatever inconvenient finding they are confronting in piece-meal fashion, rather than systematically, and without considering the implications of this rejection to the rest of the relevant scientific theory and findings. Expand
Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt
Abstract Climate scientists overwhelmingly agree that the Earth is getting warmer and that the rise in average global temperature is predominantly due to human activity. Yet a significant proportionExpand
Questioning scientific practice: linking beliefs about scientists, science agencies, and climate change
ABSTRACT The climate-change debate in the U.S. has increasingly turned from discussing climate data and scientific consensus to questioning the credibility of scientists. While disinterested unbiasedExpand
A blind expert test of contrarian claims about climate data
Although virtually all experts agree that CO2 emissions are causing anthropogenic global warming, public discourse is replete with contrarian claims that either deny that global warming is happeningExpand
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science
It is shown that conservatism and free-market worldview strongly predict rejection of climate science, in contrast to their weaker and opposing effects on acceptance of vaccinations, and that conspiracist ideation is associated with the rejection of all scientific propositions tested. Expand
The conditional effect of conspiracy thinking on attitudes toward climate change
Even though climate scientists are nearly unanimous that climate change is real and manmade, about 40% of Americans reject the scientific consensus. Why? The largest contributing factor isExpand
How Believing Climate Change is a “Hoax” Shapes Climate Skepticism in the United States
ABSTRACT Using data gathered from an online survey of residents of the geographic Pacific Northwest (N = 1000) who are skeptical of climate change, we examine the nuances of the belief that climateExpand
Financial market response to extreme events indicating climatic change
A variety of recent extreme climatic events are considered to be strong evidence that the climate is warming, but these incremental advances in certainty often seem ignored by non-scientists. IExpand
Why It Matters: U.S. Adult Perceptions of Environmental Scientist Agreement on Global Warming
Pseudoscience beliefs, whether on vaccines, evolution, or climate change, share common ground: Through firsthand experience, ideological doctrine, or even fraud, they deny systematic science methodsExpand


Global warming estimates, media expectations, and the asymmetry of scientific challenge
Abstract Mass media in the U.S. continue to suggest that scientific consensus estimates of global climate disruption, such as those from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), areExpand
Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Fifty-two percent of Americans think most climate scientists agree that the Earth has been warming in recent years, and 47% think climate scientists agree (i.e., that there is a scientific consensus)Expand
Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? §
A B S T R A C T Social surveys suggest that the American public’s concern about climate change has declined dramatically since 2008. This has led to a search for explanations for this decline, andExpand
Expert credibility in climate change
An extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data is used to show that 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Expand
Climate Change Policy
Having risen from relative obscurity as few as ten years ago, climate change now looms large among environmental policy issues. Its scope is global; the potential environmental and economic impactsExpand
Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects
U.S. public opinion regarding climate change has become increasingly polarized in recent years, as partisan think tanks and others worked to recast an originally scientific topic into a politicalExpand
How much should the public know about climate science?
The article in this issue of Climatic Change, by Shepardson et al., “Student Conceptions about the Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming, and Climate Change,” is more than a science education assessmentExpand
Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States
A B S T R A C T We examine whether conservative white males are more likely than are other adults in the U.S. general public to endorse climate change denial. We draw theoretical and analyticalExpand
The Copenhagen Diagnosis: Updating the World on the Latest Climate Science
The Copenhagen Diagnosis is a summary of the global warming peer reviewed science since 2007. Produced by a team of 26 scientists led by the University of New South Wales Climate Research Centre, theExpand
Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy
In this article, we argue that a major reason the United States failed to ratify the Kyoto Protocol to ameliorate global warming is the opposition of the American conservative movement, a key segmentExpand