Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some Psychometric Limitations

@article{Boyle1995MyersBriggsTI,
  title={Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some Psychometric Limitations},
  author={G. Boyle},
  journal={Australian Psychologist},
  year={1995},
  volume={30},
  pages={71-74}
}
  • G. Boyle
  • Published 1995
  • Psychology
  • Australian Psychologist
  • The present paper critically reviews the psychometric adequacy of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Although the instrument is extremely popular in applied settings, there is an urgent need for the development of valid and comprehensive local norms, in order to increase its predictive validity and utility within the Australian context. In addition, there is a number of psychometric limitations pertaining to the reliability and validity of the MBTI, which raise concerns about its use by… CONTINUE READING
    122 Citations
    Cautionary comments regarding the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
    • 115
    • PDF
    Personality Assessment for Employee Development: Ivory Tower or Real World?
    • 5
    • PDF
    Distal factors in risk perception
    • 93
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
    Construct Validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
    • 101
    Recent assessments of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
    • J. G. Carlson
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Journal of personality assessment
    • 1985
    • 168
    Item validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.
    • 98
    An assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator.
    • M. Carlyn
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • Journal of personality assessment
    • 1977
    • 280
    • Highly Influential
    Regression of Myers-Briggs Type Scales
    • 6
    Test-Retest Reliabilities of Continuous Scores on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
    • 66
    Self-report measures of depression: some psychometric considerations.
    • G. Boyle
    • Psychology, Medicine
    • The British journal of clinical psychology
    • 1985
    • 157
    Field Independence and Myers-Briggs Thinking Individuals
    • 6
    • Highly Influential