My Brother’s Keeper: Assurbanipal versus Šamaš-šuma-ukīn

  title={My Brother’s Keeper: Assurbanipal versus {\vS}ama{\vs}-{\vs}uma-ukīn},
  author={Shana Zaia},
  journal={Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History},
  pages={19 - 52}
  • Shana Zaia
  • Published 17 November 2018
  • History
  • Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History
Abstract When Esarhaddon named his successors, he split the empire between two of his sons, with Assurbanipal as king of Assyria and Šamaš-šuma-ukīn as king of Babylonia. This arrangement functioned until 652 BCE, at which point a civil war began between the brothers. The war ended with Assurbanipal’s victory and Šamaš-šuma-ukīn’s death in 648 BCE. While Šamaš-šuma-ukīn’s death is mentioned in several of Assurbanipal’s inscriptions, it is still unclear how the king of Babylon met his end, and… 
2 Citations
Šamaš-šuma-ukīn is a unique case in the Neo-Assyrian Empire: he was a member of the Assyrian royal family who was installed as king of Babylonia but never of Assyria. Previous Assyrian rulers who had
The Burning of Captives in the Assyrian Royal Inscriptions, and Early Neo-Assyrian Conceptions of the Other
  • B. Dewar
  • History
    Studia Orientalia Electronica
  • 2021
This paper is a study of the topos of the king burning captives in the Assyrian royal inscriptions. This punishment is notable for both its rarity and its cruelty, being the only time that the royal


Rebellion, Sargon II’s “Punishment” and the Death of Aššur-nādin-šumi in the Inscriptions of Sennacherib
Abstract Despite the frequency of rebellions against the Neo-Assyrian king Sennacherib, very few events in his annals are described as such. Instead rebels are often described as having never
The “Sin of Sargon” and Esarhaddon's Reconception of Sennacherib: A study in divine will, human politics and royal ideology
According to his inscriptions, Sennacherib, king of Assyria, conquered and razed the city of Babylon in 689 BCE. Previous Neo-Assyrian monarchs had employed a variety of strategies while attempting
The Sitz im Leben of Esarhaddon's Apology
  • A. Knapp
  • History
    Journal of Cuneiform Studies
  • 2016
Since the publication of Hayim Tadmor's seminal 1983 essay, “Autobiographical Apology in the Royal Assyrian Literature,” scholars have almost universally accepted that the imminent nomination of
State-Sponsored Sacrilege: “Godnapping” and Omission in Neo-Assyrian Inscriptions
Abstract Because of the symbolic and religious importance of cult statues in ancient Mesopotamia, these images were targeted on numerous occasions by invading forces as part of the conquest of a
The Royal Inscriptions of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680-669 Bc)
The Royal Inscription of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680-669 BC) is the inaugural volume of the Royal Inscriptions of the Neo-Assyrian Period Project. The volume provides reliable, up-to-date
The Great City: Nineveh in the Age of Sennacherib
The Biblical book of Jonah calls Nineveh “the great city.” This is hardly exaggerated. During her heydays in the seventh century BCE, when serving as the political capital of the Assyrian empire,
The Madness of King Rusa: the psychology of despair in eighth century Assyria
Assyrian royal inscriptions, often dismissed as formulaic accounts of military campaigns, can be highly expressive in their representation of emotions, a subject of research that has gained much
Assur Is King! Assur Is King!: Religion in the Exercise of Power in the Neo-Assyrian Empire
Steven Holloway's work is the first monograph devoted to Neo-Assyrian religious imperialism. Neo-Assyrian religious imperialism was expressed by punitive measures such as "godnapping", the violent
13. The First “World Event”: Sennacherib at Jerusalem
This chapter surveys stories about Sennacherib in the seven cultural traditions, and an examination of the original formative conditions that fostered their widespread popularity in the cosmopolitan
“They Heard from a Distance”: The šemû-rūqu Paradigm in the Late Neo-Assyrian Empire
Abstract In its first 500 years, Assyrian imperial ideology was based on the idea that the empire was a monopole, a unique and ever-expanding core of order and right that continuously pushed back the