Mutual Mate Choice and Sex Differences in Choosiness.

@article{Johnstone1996MutualMC,
  title={Mutual Mate Choice and Sex Differences in Choosiness.},
  author={Rufus A. Johnstone and John D. Reynolds and James C. Deutsch},
  journal={Evolution; international journal of organic evolution},
  year={1996},
  volume={50 4},
  pages={1382-1391}
}
Sexual competition is associated closely with parental care because the sex providing less care has a higher potential rate of reproduction, and hence more to gain from competing for multiple mates. Sex differences in choosiness are not easily explained, however. The lower-caring sex (often males) has both higher costs of choice, because it is more difficult to find replacement mates, and higher direct benefits, because the sex providing more care (usually females) is likely to exhibit more… CONTINUE READING
Highly Influential
This paper has highly influenced 16 other papers. REVIEW HIGHLY INFLUENTIAL CITATIONS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 144 extracted citations

Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.

Journal of evolutionary biology • 2008
View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…