Must reliable signals always be costly?

@article{Smith1994MustRS,
  title={Must reliable signals always be costly?},
  author={J. M. Smith},
  journal={Animal Behaviour},
  year={1994},
  volume={47},
  pages={1115-1120}
}
  • J. M. Smith
  • Published 1994
  • Sociology
  • Animal Behaviour
  • Abstract Abstract. It has previously been shown that, in some circumstances, animal signals can be a reliable guide to the state of the signaller only if the signal is more costly than is needed to convey the information unambiguously. However, an analysis of a simple model, the Philip Sidney game, showed that there are also circumstances in which cost-free signals can be both reliable and evolutionarily stable. The essential requirement for a cost-free signal to be stable is that the two… CONTINUE READING
    152 Citations
    What are conventional signals?
    • 104
    Cheap talk when interests conflict
    • 143
    • PDF
    The validity of the handicap principle in discrete action-response games
    • 40
    • PDF
    Signalling among relatives. II. Beyond the tower of Babel.
    • 99
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    The cost of dishonesty
    • H. Viljugrein
    • Medicine
    • Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
    • 1997
    • 30
    • Highly Influenced
    Signalling among relatives. I. Is costly signalling too costly
    • 97
    • PDF
    Communication and Common Interest
    • 30
    • PDF
    Efficacy and Honesty in Communication between Relatives
    • 27