Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data?

@article{Bem2011MustPC,
  title={Must psychologists change the way they analyze their data?},
  author={D. Bem and J. Utts and W. Johnson},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={2011},
  volume={101 4},
  pages={
          716-9
        }
}
  • D. Bem, J. Utts, W. Johnson
  • Published 2011
  • Psychology, Geography, Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
Wagenmakers, Wetzels, Borsboom, and van der Maas (2011) argued that psychologists should replace the familiar "frequentist" statistical analyses of their data with bayesian analyses. To illustrate their argument, they reanalyzed a set of psi experiments published recently in this journal by Bem (2011), maintaining that, contrary to his conclusion, his data do not yield evidence in favor of the psi hypothesis. We argue that they have incorrectly selected an unrealistic prior distribution for… Expand

Tables and Topics from this paper

Why Bayesian Psychologists Should Change the Way They Use the Bayes Factor
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
Is the call to abandon p-values the red herring of the replicability crisis?
A Bayes factor meta-analysis of recent extrasensory perception experiments: comment on Storm, Tressoldi, and Di Risio (2010).
How Strong is the Confirmation of a Hypothesis by Significant Data?
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).
A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem’s ESP claim
THE STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE VERSUS THE POWER OF BELIEF: ARE WE ALL BAYESIANS?
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.
  • D. Bem
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
  • 2011
...
1
2
3
...