Must a world government violate the right to exit?

@article{Duford2017MustAW,
  title={Must a world government violate the right to exit?},
  author={Rochelle Duford},
  journal={Ethics \& Global Politics},
  year={2017},
  volume={10},
  pages={19 - 36}
}
  • Rochelle Duford
  • Published 1 January 2017
  • Political Science, Sociology
  • Ethics & Global Politics
ABSTRACT This paper offers a response to the common claim that a world government is undesirable because one would not be able to leave its territory. This claim nearly always appears as an adjunct to the possibility that a world government would be irredeemably bad. I separate out two implications of the impossibility of exit: first, that a world government is unable to respect human rights; and second, that regardless of its status as rights-respecting, it is, all things considered, better to… 

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights
'Individuals have rights, and there are things no person or group may do to them (without violating their rights)." 'Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of
Exit and the duty to admit
Conventionally, it is presumed that while citizens have the right to exit the state in which they are located, no particular state (except a citizen's home state) is required to admit them. Yet, this
Citizenship and the Right to Leave
The right to leave one's country, in conjunction with the right to change one's nationality, both of which are proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), are examined in
Global Equality of Opportunity and National Integrity
Philosophers have long distinguished various interpretations of the principle of equal opportunity and argued over their implications and justifications. But they have almost always tacitly assumed
Who’s afraid of a world state? A global sovereign and the statist-cosmopolitan debate
Wary of quick statist dismissal of their proposals, cosmopolitans have been careful not to associate themselves with a world state. I argue that this caution is mistaken: cosmopolitans should see the
Beyond the ethics of admission
This article examines our moral obligations to refugees and stateless people. I argue that in order to understand our moral obligations to stateless people, both de jure refugees and de facto
Legitimate International Institutions: A Neorepublican Perspective
Neorepublican theory requires the legitimate domestic state to protect people against domination by others in a way that is not dominating itself: state coercion is to be conducted under the pressure
Perpetual peace.
  • I. Kant
  • Political Science
    Scientific American
  • 2014
TLDR
By this clausula salvatoria the author desires formally and emphatically to deprecate herewith any malevolent interpretation which might be placed on his words.
Justice and equality: an introduction
All humans are judges of Truth, Justice, and Beauty – categories that shall be taken roughly to parallel Science, Ethics, and Esthetics. All knowledge fits into these categories and is exhausted by
Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders
Many poor and oppressed people wish to leave their countries of origin in the third world to come to affluent Western societies. This essay argues that there is little justification for keeping them
...
...