Musculocutaneous neurotization to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus paralysis.


Brachial plexus injuries may result in devastating paralysis, especially if they involve all the roots. The upper roots are often traumatized, and therefore elbow flexion is usually lost. The prognosis of these injuries is grave if root avulsions are present and the paralysis includes the hand as well. The current management of brachial plexus injuries should be early, aggressive microsurgical reconstruction of the plexus, combining various neurotizations with intraplexus and extraplexus nerve donors. Following this principle, we present the results of musculocutaneous neurotization in our unit, as well as a review of the literature on this subject. Our results are comparable to those reported in the literature, and indicate that the strongest function is achieved after neurotization via intraplexus donors, while some extraplexus donors (i.e., phrenic and accessory nerve) can offer equally strong elbow flexion, especially if they are used in combination. Neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve should be one of the primary goals in the reconstruction of the injured plexus, since the return of elbow flexion is of paramount importance in daily activity. The restoration of function is ensured if the stronger and healthier motor donors are dedicated to the neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve. Sometimes in order to match the axonal number of the target to the lower number of axons offered by the donors, two or more donor nerves may be driven to the same target, such as the musculocutaneous nerve.


Citations per Year

813 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 813 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Vekris2006MusculocutaneousNT, title={Musculocutaneous neurotization to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus paralysis.}, author={Marios D. Vekris and Alexandros E. Beris and Elizabeth Ourania Johnson and Anastasios V Korobilias and Dimitrios Pafilas and Anastasios D Vekris and Panayotis N. Soucacos}, journal={Microsurgery}, year={2006}, volume={26 4}, pages={325-9} }