Muscle wasting in cancer.


Skeletal muscle loss appears to be the most significant clinical event in cancer cachexia and is associated with a poor outcome. With regard to such muscle loss, despite extensive study in a range of models, there is ongoing debate as to whether a reduction in protein synthesis, an increase in degradation or a combination of both is the more relevant. Each model differs in terms of key mediators and the pathways activated in skeletal muscle. Certain models do suggest that decreased synthesis accompanied by enhanced protein degradation via the ubiquitin proteasome pathway (UPP) is important. Murine models tend to involve rapid development of cachexia and may represent more acute muscle atrophy rather than the chronic wasting observed in humans. There is a paucity of human data both at a basic descriptive level and at a molecular/mechanism level. Progress in treating the human form of cancer cachexia can only move forwards through carefully designed large randomised controlled clinical trials of specific therapies with validated biomarkers of relevance to underlying mechanisms. This article is part of a Directed Issue entitled: Molecular basis of muscle wasting.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2013.05.032
Citations per Year

197 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 197 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Johns2013MuscleWI, title={Muscle wasting in cancer.}, author={Neil Johns and Nicholas A. Stephens and Kenneth C. H. Fearon}, journal={The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology}, year={2013}, volume={45 10}, pages={2215-29} }