Munda languages are father tongues, but Japanese and Korean are not

@article{Chaubey2020MundaLA,
  title={Munda languages are father tongues, but Japanese and Korean are not},
  author={Gyaneshwer Chaubey and George van Driem},
  journal={Evolutionary Human Sciences},
  year={2020},
  volume={2}
}
Abstract Abstract Over two decades ago, it was observed that the linguistic affinity of the language spoken by a particular population tended to correlate with the predominant paternal, i.e. Y-chromosomal, lineage found in that population. Such correlations were found to be ubiquitous but not universal, and the striking exceptions to such conspicuous patterns of correlation between linguistic and genetic phylogeography elicit particular interest and beg for clarification. Within the… 
About millets and beans, words and genes
Abstract In this special collection, we address the origin and dispersal of the Transeurasian languages, i.e. Japonic, Koreanic, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic, from an interdisciplinary perspective.
The origins of multi-cropping agriculture in Southwestern China: Archaeobotanical insights from third to first millennium B.C. Yunnan
Yunnan’s location at the crossroad of temperate China, Northeast India and tropical mainland Southeast Asia makes it a pivotal area for the understanding of early cultural contacts and agricultural

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 156 REFERENCES
Altaic Languages. History of research, survey, classification and a sketch of comparative grammar
The present monograph represents a manual, summarizing state-of-the-art of the Altaic diachronic linguistics, concentrates on development of linguistic research in the Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic,
The origins of Sinitic
A persistent problem in Sino-Tibetan linguistics is that Chinese is characterized by a mix of lexical, phonological, and syntactic features, some of which link it to the Tibeto-Burman languages,
Beyond the Austronesian homeland : The austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology
TW lhen it comes to questions of distant genetic relationship in linguistics I must confess that I have always come down very decidedly on the side of skepticism. To some extent this orientation may
Dissecting the paternal founders of Mundari (Austroasiatic) speakers associated with the language dispersal in South Asia
TLDR
The arrival of Austroasiatic languages in South Asia during last 5000 years is suggested by the new results, which suggest at least three founders downstream to haplogroup O2a-M95 are likely to have been associated with the dispersal of Austraasiatic language to South Asia.
The Japanese inflectional paradigm in a Transeurasian perspective
TLDR
The paper concludes that the correlations in verb inflections between Japanese and Transeurasian languages are indeed paradigmatic and more likely to be inherited than to be coincidental or borrowed.
Genes reveal traces of common recent demographic history for most of the Uralic-speaking populations
TLDR
It is shown that most Uralic speakers share a distinct ancestry component of likely Siberian origin, which suggests that the spread of U Russia languages involved at least some demic component, and co-dispersion of genes and languages.
The genetic legacy of continental scale admixture in Indian Austroasiatic speakers
TLDR
Using genome-wide genotype data of 102 Munda speakers and contextual data from South and Southeast Asia, admixture dates between 2000–3800 years ago for different populations of Munda are retrieved and the grouping of the MundA speakers into North and South Munda based on linguistics is in concordance with genome- wide data.
Dual origins of the Japanese: common ground for hunter-gatherer and farmer Y chromosomes
TLDR
Coalescent analyses of Y chromosome short tandem repeat diversity indicated that haplogroups D and C began their expansions in Japan ∼20,000 and ∼12,000 years ago, respectively, while haplogroup O-47z began its expansion only ∼4,400 years ago.
Ethnic derivation of the Ainu inferred from ancient mitochondrial DNA data
TLDR
The results suggest that the Ainu were formed from the Hokkaido Jomon people, but subsequently underwent considerable admixture with adjacent populations, and that the Siberian influence on this population is far greater than previously recognized.
Population genetic structure in Indian Austroasiatic speakers: the role of landscape barriers and sex-specific admixture.
TLDR
It is proposed that AA speakers in India today are derived from dispersal from southeast Asia, followed by extensive sex-specific admixture with local Indian populations, strongly supporting the first of the two hypotheses.
...
...