Much Ado about Nothing

@inproceedings{Priest2014MuchAA,
  title={Much Ado about Nothing},
  author={G. Priest},
  year={2014}
}
Let us start with non-existent objects. I will assume a certain view of these. I will not defend it here; this has been done elsewhere.2 The point in what follows will be to apply it. So let me simply summarise the core points. Some objects do not exist: fictional characters, such as Sherlock Holmes; failed objects of scientific postulation, such as the mooted planet Vulcan; God (any one that you don’t believe in). Yet we can think of them, fear them, admire them, just as we can existent… Expand
5 Citations
Nothingness, Meinongianism and inconsistent mereology
  • 6
A Note on Priest's Mereology
  • 1
  • Highly Influenced
Gluon Theory: Being and Nothingness
Is Weak Supplementation analytic?
  • 1
  • PDF
Proof-Theoretic Semantics for Intensional Transitive Verbs
  • N. Francez
  • Computer Science, Philosophy
  • J. Semant.
  • 2016
  • 3

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES
There are no ordinary things
  • 170
What is metaphysics?
  • 103
  • PDF
Of Time and the Null Individual
  • 13
Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics
  • 286
  • Highly Influential
Nonclassical Mereology and Its Application to Sets
  • P. Forrest
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • Notre Dame J. Formal Log.
  • 2002
  • 21
  • PDF
Space, Time, and Stuff
  • 58
  • Highly Influential
Region-Based Topology
  • P. Roeper
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • J. Philos. Log.
  • 1997
  • 95
Nothingness’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nothingness
  • Accessed February
  • 2012
Mereology’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entires/mereology
  • Accessed February
  • 2009
Confining Composition
  • Journal of Philosophy
  • 2006
...
1
2
...