Morphology and two-lewel rules and negative rule features

@inproceedings{Bear1988MorphologyAT,
  title={Morphology and two-lewel rules and negative rule features},
  author={John Bear},
  booktitle={COLING},
  year={1988}
}
Two-level phonology, as currently practiced, has two severe limitations. One is that phonological generalizations are generally expressed in terms of transition tables of finite-state automata, and these tables are cumbersome to develop and refine. The other is that lexical idiosyncrasy is encoded by introducing arbitrary diacritics into the spelling of a morpheme. This paper explains how phonological rules may be employed instead of transition tables and describes a more elegant way of… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Figures, tables, results, connections, and topics extracted from this paper.
7 Extracted Citations
2 Extracted References
Similar Papers

Referenced Papers

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-2 of 2 references

Kimmo: A General MorphologicM

  • Bear, John
  • Dalrymple et al., eds., Linguistics Department,
  • 1986
2 Excerpts

Interpreting Two-level Rules Directly," presented at a Stanford workshop on finite-state morphology

  • Bear, John
  • 1985

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…