More misleading science from the tobacco industry

@article{Thun2003MoreMS,
  title={More misleading science from the tobacco industry},
  author={Michael J. Thun},
  journal={BMJ : British Medical Journal},
  year={2003},
  volume={327},
  pages={E237 - E238}
}
  • M. Thun
  • Published 30 July 2003
  • Medicine
  • BMJ : British Medical Journal
Delaying clean air laws through disinformation 
‘The industry must be inconspicuous’: Japan Tobacco’s corruption of science and health policy via the Smoking Research Foundation
TLDR
Investigating how and why Japan Tobacco, Inc. established the Smoking Research Foundation (SRF), a research-funding institution, and the extent to which SRF has influenced science and health policy in Japan found that contrary to industry claims, SRF was never meant to be independent or neutral. Expand
New Policy of the Journal of Epidemiology Regarding the Relationship With the Tobacco Industry
TLDR
This work aims to provide a clear picture of the immune system’s response to chemotherapy and aims to establish a smoking cessation strategy that can be relied on for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Expand
The limits of competing interest disclosures.
TLDR
These findings are another example of how simply requiring authors to disclose financial ties with the tobacco industry may not be adequate to give readers a full picture of the author's relationship with the industry. Expand
Campaign to revitalise academic medicine: Funding needs to be on the discussion table
EDITOR—I was disappointed at the statement in Tugwell's editorial on the campaign to revitalise academic medicine that deals with how to tackle current failures.1 He mentions working within currentExpand
Letters
We are writing to address the misleading BMJ USA editorial by Michael Thun of the American Cancer Society and the BMJ USA “Editor’s Choice” by Steven Woolf 2 that were published in the same issue ofExpand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 17 REFERENCES
Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders
This page contains a PDF version of the Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking report.
Print media coverage of research on passive smoking
TLDR
Although research on the harmful effects of passive smoking accumulated between 1981 and 1994, lay press coverage of the research maintained that the science was controversial. Expand
Publication bias in the environmental tobacco smoke/coronary heart disease epidemiologic literature.
TLDR
Two approaches are used to assess publication bias in the environmental tobacco smoke/coronary heart disease (ETS/CHD) literature: statistical tests applied to all sex-specific relative risk estimates from 14 previously published studies indicate that publication bias is likely, and comparison of pooled relative risk figures indicates that published data overestimate the association of spousal smoking and CHD. Expand
Involuntary smoking and lung cancer.
  • P. Boffetta
  • Medicine
  • Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health
  • 2002
TLDR
A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on lung cancer and exposure to involuntary smoking from the spouse included 51 studies found that cumulative exposure suggested a dose-response relationship with a unit risk of similar magnitude. Expand
Epidemiologic studies of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease and ETS exposure from spousal smoking.
TLDR
The evidence linking heart disease and ETS exposure from a spouse has become substantially stronger since OSHA first proposed including heart disease in its risk assessment of ETS in 1994. Expand
Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
TLDR
It is more likely than not that the observed association is not an artifact and that ETS causes lung cancer in non smokers, and the risk of lung cancer increased consistently with increasing levels of exposure. Expand
Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions.
TLDR
The conclusions of review articles on the health effects of passive smoking are strongly associated with the affiliations of their authors, and readers should consider authors' affiliations when deciding how to judge an article's conclusions. Expand
Environmental tobacco smoke and coronary heart disease in the American Cancer Society CPS-II cohort.
TLDR
Results are consistent with prior reports that never-smokers currently exposed to ETS have about 20% higher CHD death rates, however, the data do not show consistent dose-response trends and are possibly subject to confounding by unmeasured risk factors. Expand
Secondhand alarmists blowing smoke
  • Seattle Post-Intelligencer March
  • 2003
Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a metaanalysis
  • Lung Cancer
  • 2000
...
1
2
...