More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games

@article{Ruffle1998MoreIB,
  title={More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games},
  author={Bradley J. Ruffle},
  journal={Games and Economic Behavior},
  year={1998},
  volume={23},
  pages={247-265}
}
Abstract This paper examines Allocators' willingness to reward and punish their paired Recipients. Recipients only compete in a skill-testing contest, the outcome of which determines the size of the surplus. In the dictator game, Allocators reward skillful Recipients, but punish unskillful ones only modestly. The punishment effect is mitigated by the belief held by some Allocators that effort is the appropriate measure of deservingness. The ultimatum game extension reveals offerers' ability to… 

Tables from this paper

Fairness in Extended Dictator Game Experiments
Abstract We test the robustness of behavior in dictator games by offering allocators the choice to play an unattractive lottery. With this lottery option, mean transfers from allocators to recipients
Entitlement in a Real Effort Ultimatum Game
Data from lab experiments support the claim that individuals have social preferences. Most models of social preferences, however, consider only the distribution of outcomes, not the source of the
On gamesmen and fair men: explaining fairness in non-cooperative bargaining games
TLDR
The proposed ‘economic harmony’ model, in which the individual's utility was modified by defining it as a function of the ratio between the actual and aspired pay-offs, is extended to bargaining games with alternating offers.
Do Wealth Differences Affect Fairness Considerations?
The influence of relative wealth on fairness considerations is analyzed in an ultimatum game experiment in which participants receive large and widely unequal initial endowments. Subjects initially
Does Wealth Affect Fairness Considerations
The influence of wealth on fairness considerations is analyzed in a series of ultimatum game experiments where proposers and receivers are given large and widely unequal initial endowments. Subjects
Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games
Fairness Matters in Agent Relationships : A Comparison between Ultimatum Games , Dictator Games and Principal-Agent Problems
Gustafsson, M., Gärling T., & Fujii, S., Fairness Matters in Agent Relationships: A Comparison between Ultimatum Games, Dictator Games and Principal-Agent Problems. Göteborg Psychological Reports,
If you've earned it, you deserve it: ultimatums, with Lego
  • A. Oliver
  • Economics
    Behavioural Public Policy
  • 2021
The ultimatum and dictator games were developed to help identify the fundamental motivators of human behavior, typically by asking participants to share windfall endowments with other persons. In
Can ’ t Touch This ! Willingness to Keep “ Dirty Money
Traditionally, larger than equilibrium allocations by proposers in Dictator Games (gifts) have been explained by aspects of altruism, reciprocity, and fairness. However, this assumes the gift to be
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games
Research on ultimatum and dictator games has found that because of "fairness" first movers in such games offer more than noncooperative game theory predicts. We find that if the right to be the first
Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining
Abstract Previous investigations have shown that laboratory play of the ultimatum game differs from the perfect equilibrium prediction. The anonymity hypothesis attributes this to a distortion of
Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games
We conduct double-anonymous dictator experiments to explore the role of altruism in motivating subjects’ behavior. We vary the extent to which an anonymous recipient is deserving of aid and
Entitlements, Rights, and Fairness: An Experimental Examination of Subjects' Concepts of Distributive Justice
THE research reported in this paper arose from a previous experimental study conducted by the authors.' That study involved bargains struck between two subjects who had opposing payoff functions and
Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
A major unsolved riddle facing the social sciences is the cause of impasse in negotiations. The consequences of impasse are evident in the amount of private and public resources spent on civil
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Abstract We designed an experiment to study trust and reciprocity in an investment setting. This design controls for alternative explanations of behavior including repeat game reputation effects,
Handbook of Experimental Economics
This book, which comprises eight chapters, presents a comprehensive critical survey of the results and methods of laboratory experiments in economics. The first chapter provides an introduction to
Equity: Theory and Research
TLDR
This book discusses political participation, voting, and elections in the United States, as well as the role that the media and other institutions have in shaping public opinion and opinion.
...
...