More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games

@article{Ruffle1998MoreIB,
  title={More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum Games},
  author={Bradley J. Ruffle},
  journal={Games and Economic Behavior},
  year={1998},
  volume={23},
  pages={247-265}
}
  • Bradley J. Ruffle
  • Published 1998
  • Economics
  • Games and Economic Behavior
  • Abstract This paper examines Allocators' willingness to reward and punish their paired Recipients. Recipients only compete in a skill-testing contest, the outcome of which determines the size of the surplus. In the dictator game, Allocators reward skillful Recipients, but punish unskillful ones only modestly. The punishment effect is mitigated by the belief held by some Allocators that effort is the appropriate measure of deservingness. The ultimatum game extension reveals offerers' ability to… CONTINUE READING

    Tables from this paper.

    Entitlement in a Real Effort Ultimatum Game
    1
    Equity and bargaining power in ultimatum games
    12
    Yours, Mine, and Ours: The Effect of Ersatz Property Rights on Outcome Based Fairness and Reciprocity

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES
    Anonymity versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining
    492
    Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games
    908
    Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
    4132
    Handbook of Experimental Economics
    3623
    Equity : theory and research
    1577
    Applied behavioural economics
    19