Morals, reason, and animals

@inproceedings{Sapontzis1987MoralsRA,
  title={Morals, reason, and animals},
  author={Steve F. Sapontzis},
  year={1987}
}
Preface Acknowledgments Part I: The Moral (In)Significance of Reason 1. Why Should I Be Rational? "Rationality" and Its Alternatives * The Methodological Counterattack * The Moral of the Story 2. Where Reason Enters In--and Where It Doesn't Incidentally Good Actions * Ulterior Motives * Acting Out of Context * Moral Agents, Philosophers, and Judges * Summary and Conclusion 3. Being Rational and Acting Morally What "Rational" Refers To * Can Only Rational Beings Be Moral Agents? * Acting for the… 
Utilitarian killing, replacement, and rights
TLDR
It is concluded that utilitarians cannot escape the killing and replaceability objections, and those who reject the restrictive moral agency view and find they cannot accept utilitarianism's unsavory implications must look to a different ethical theory to guide their treatment of humans and non-humans.
The Moral Framework of Peter Singer's Animal Liberation
Peter Singer's arguments in Animal Liberation have often been mis- interpreted. The most common, and momentous, misinterpretation among professional philosophers consists in the belief that the moral
Darwin's Doubts and the Problems of Animal Pain
It is a truism that the influence of Darwin’s work on evolution is profound and ubiquitous. Thus, it should come as no surprise that the first chapter of Frans de Waal’s book, Good Natured, is
Minding Nature: A Defense of a Sentiocentric Approach to Environmental Ethics
In this chapter, I begin by tracing the origins of the alleged inconsistency between animal ethics and environmental ethics in late 20th century philosophical discourse. I then clarify the debate in
Animal research: a moral science
TLDR
My own experience of being vilified as ‘anti‐science’ by the scientific community has been reflected in societal debates on animal research.
Moral Status and Human Life: The Case for Children's Superiority
This book develops a comprehensive theory of moral status, responding to the disparate partial accounts offered by animal rights proponents, environmental theorists, Kantians, and care ethicists and
Animals, Nature, and Ethics
Recently, Howard (1993, Journal of Mammalogy, 74:234–235) argued for the defensibility of research on nonhuman animals (hereafter animals). Unfortunately, his essay is unnecessarily combative,
Comparing Lives and Epistemic Limitations: A Critique of Regan's Lifeboat from An Unprivileged Position
In The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that although all subjects-of-a-life have equal inherent value, there are often differences in the value of the lives of beings with inherent value.
Moral and nonmoral innate constraints
TLDR
It is proposed that if a genetic component of moral behavior is to be discovered, some sorting out of specifically moral from nonmoral innate constraints will be necessary and humans who could bring the nonmoral evaluative capacities to bear upon whatever moral intuitions might be genetically conserved in mammalian heritage would have an advantage over similar beings who could not.
Taking Humanism Seriously: ``Obligatory'' Anthropocentrism
Humanism – in the sense that humans alonehave moral standing, or else a surpassing degree of it– has traditionally dominated all of ethicaldiscourse. However, its past formulations havesuccumbed to
...
...