Moral responsibility for actions: epistemic and freedom conditions

@article{Mele2010MoralRF,
  title={Moral responsibility for actions: epistemic and freedom conditions},
  author={A. Mele},
  journal={Philosophical Explorations},
  year={2010},
  volume={13},
  pages={101 - 111}
}
  • A. Mele
  • Published 2010
  • Psychology
  • Philosophical Explorations
  • Two questions guide this article. First, according to Fischer and Ravizza (jointly and otherwise), what epistemic requirements for being morally responsible for performing an action A are not also requirements for freely performing A? Second, how much progress have they made on this front? The article's main moral is for philosophers who believe that there are epistemic requirements for being morally responsible for A-ing that are not requirements for freely A-ing because they assume that… CONTINUE READING
    16 Citations
    Habit, Omission and Responsibility
    Moral responsibility and the continuation problem
    • 17
    Robustness and Up-to-us-ness
    Luck and Free Will
    • 4
    Are we all exploiters

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
    My Way: Essays on Moral Responsibility
    • 117
    Essays on Actions and Events.
    • 396
    Free will and luck
    • 98
    • Highly Influential
    Deontic morality and control
    • 52
    The Truth about Tracing
    • 50
    • PDF
    The Nicomachean Ethics
    • 4,409
    • PDF
    Living with Uncertainty
    • 119
    Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility
    • 339
    • Highly Influential
    Actions
    • Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Mavrodes, G. 1986. Religion and the queerness of morality. In Rationality, religious belief, and moral
    • 1980
    Acts and other events
    • 106