Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.

  title={Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.},
  author={Tage S. Rai and Alan Page Fiske},
  journal={Psychological review},
  volume={118 1},
Genuine moral disagreement exists and is widespread. To understand such disagreement, we must examine the basic kinds of social relationships people construct across cultures and the distinct moral obligations and prohibitions these relationships entail. We extend relational models theory (Fiske, 1991) to identify 4 fundamental and distinct moral motives. Unity is the motive to care for and support the integrity of in-groups by avoiding or eliminating threats of contamination and providing aid… 

Moral values, social ideologies and threat-based cognition: Implications for intergroup relations

Moral foundations theory (MFT) has provided an account of the moral values that underscore different cultural and political ideologies, and these moral values of harm, fairness, loyalty, authority,


Across social and personality psychology, there is renewed interest in morality. Consistent with these fields’ general emphasis on subjective psychological processes, recent work tends to view any

Implicit Theories of Morality, Personality, and Contextual Factors in Moral Appraisal

This article explores the implicit theories of morality, or the conceptions regarding the patterns of stability, continuity and change in moral dispositions, both in lay and academic discourses. The

When Values and Behavior Conflict: Moral Pluralism and Intrapersonal Moral Hypocrisy

The authors review the various ways moral hypocrisy has been defined and operationalized by social psychologists, concentrating on three general types: moral duplicity, moral double standards, and

Beyond harmfulness and impurity: Moral wrongness as a violation of relational motivations.

It is argued that violation of relational motives will predict the perception of the moral wrongness of moral transgressions better than violation of harmlessness or purity and that "metarelational threat" plays an important role in determining the degree of moralwrongness of a particular act.

The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology.

Academic AbstractThe idea of "purity" transformed moral psychology. Here, we provide the first systematic review of this concept. Although often discussed as one construct, we reveal ~9

Beyond Harm, Intention, and Dyads: Relationship Regulation, Virtuous Violence, and Metarelational Morality

In the target article, Gray, Young, and Waytz (GYW) offer a unifying definition of the “moral” domain. The strong version of their argument is that moral judgments consist of cognizing an agent

Cubist Consequentialism: The Pros and Cons of an Agent–Patient Template for Morality

Gray, Young, and Waytz (this issue) make a compelling case for why mind perception is a vital component of moral judgment. The agent–patient dyad is a useful tool that helps identify and organize the

How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments

It is shown that this ‘relational norms’ model better predicts patterns of moral wrongness judgments across relationships than alternative models based on genetic relatedness, social closeness, or interdependence, demonstrating how the perceived morality of actions depends not only on the actions themselves, but also on the relational context in which those actions occur.



Moral Exclusion, Personal Goal Theory, and Extreme Destructiveness

The article describes how certain motives can combine with the exclusion of people from the moral universe, leading to torture, genocide, and mass killing. Personal goal theory is presented as a

Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.

Suggestions for a New Integration in the Psychology of Morality

To prepare a basis for a new model of morality, theories in the psychology of morality are reviewed, comparing those put forward before and after the emergence of evolutionary psychology in the last

Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction

Moral exclusion occurs when individuals or groups are perceived as outside the boundary in which moral values, rules, and considerations of fairness apply. Those who are morally excluded are

Social roles and the moral judgement of acts and omissions

Three experiments investigated how moral judgements of harmful acts and omissions are affected by information about social roles. Subjects were given vignettes in which the relationship between an

Culture and moral judgment: how are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved?

Results imply that Indians possess a postconventional moral code in which interpersonal responsibilities are seen in as fully principled terms as justice obligations and may be accorded precedence over justice obligations.

Using a Relational Models Perspective to Understand Normatively Appropriate Conduct in Ethical Leadership

To describe leadership as ethical is largely a perceptional phenomenon informed by beliefs about what is normatively appropriate. Yet there is a remarkable scarcity in the leadership literature

A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo

Most theories in social and political psychology stress self-interest, intergroup conflict, ethnocentrism, homophily, ingroup bias, outgroup antipathy, dominance, and resistance. System justification

Cultural Variation and Similarity in Moral Rhetorics

Past research on morality has emphasized a single justice-based moral ethic. Expanding this conception of morality, Shweder has proposed a universal taxonomy of three moral rhetorics related to