Moral Rationalization and the Integration of Situational Factors and Psychological Processes in Immoral Behavior

@article{Tsang2002MoralRA,
  title={Moral Rationalization and the Integration of Situational Factors and Psychological Processes in Immoral Behavior},
  author={Jo-Ann Tsang},
  journal={Review of General Psychology},
  year={2002},
  volume={6},
  pages={25 - 50}
}
  • Jo-Ann Tsang
  • Published 1 March 2002
  • Psychology
  • Review of General Psychology
Moral rationalization is an individual's ability to reinterpret his or her immoral actions as, in fact, moral. It arises out of a conflict of motivations and a need to see the self as moral. This article presents a model of evil behavior demonstrating how situational factors that obscure moral relevance can interact with moral rationalization and lead to a violation of moral principles. Concepts such as cognitive dissonance and self-affirmation are used to explain the processes underlying moral… 

Figures from this paper

Moral Rationalization Contributes More Strongly to Escalation of Unethical Behavior Among Low Moral Identifiers Than Among High Moral Identifiers

The results show that engaging in moral rationalization causes subsequent continuation and escalation of previous immoral behavior, but more so for low moral identifiers than for high moral identifiers.

Tip of the Hat, Wag of the Finger: How Moral Decoupling Enables Consumers to Admire and Admonish

What reasoning processes do consumers use to support public figures who act immorally? Existing research emphasizes moral rationalization, whereby people reconstrue improper behavior in order to

Threats to Moral Identity: Testing the Effects of Incentives and Consequences of One's Actions on Moral Cleansing

Results found that incentives and consequences interacted such that unethical thoughts were especially threatening, resulting in more moral cleansing, when large incentives to cheat were present and cheating explicitly harmed others.

Moral Credentialing and the Rationalization of Misconduct

A paradigm designed to investigate deliberative and rationalized forms of cheating found that when participants had credentialed themselves via a set of hypothetical moral dilemmas, they were more likely to cheat on a subsequent math task, but only if cheating was highly rationalizable.

Antecedents of Deviant Behavior: Psychological and Non-Psychological Factors and Ethical Justifications

  • E. Di Carlo
  • Psychology, Business
    Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
  • 2021
An integrative model of ethical justifications in organizations is proposed. The model recognizes the roles of psychological and non-psychological factors on the link between ethical theories and the

Straying From the Righteous Path and From Ourselves

It is argued that perceived self-knowledge may play a functional role in moral self-concept maintenance and moral regulatory processes, such that people experience lower levels of self- knowledge when they are reminded of their immoral behaviors.

Reconceptualizing Moral Disengagement as a Process: Transcending Overly Liberal and Overly Conservative Practice in the Field

Moral disengagement was initially conceptualized as a process through which people reconstrue unethical behaviors, with the effect of deactivating self-sanctions and thereby clearing the way for

What Leads to Evocation of Moral Outrage? Exploring the Role of Personal Morality

Anger is usually evoked when an individual perceives that his/her moral standard or principle has been violated.This has been termed as “moral outrage.” However, some researchers have suggested that

From Sucker to Saint

These studies demonstrate that moral judgments can be more deeply embedded in judges' immediate social contexts–and driven more by motivations to maintain self-image—than is typically appreciated in contemporary moral-psychology research.

Nobody is as Blind as Those Who Cannot Bear to See: Psychoanalytic Perspectives on the Management of Emotions and Moral Blindness

Although apparently irrational, people with seemingly high moral standards routinely make immoral decisions or engage in morally questionable behavior. It appears as if under certain circumstances,
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 64 REFERENCES

Moral Exclusion and Injustice: An Introduction

Moral exclusion occurs when individuals or groups are perceived as outside the boundary in which moral values, rules, and considerations of fairness apply. Those who are morally excluded are

Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities

  • A. Bandura
  • Psychology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 1999
Given the many mechanisms for disengaging moral control, civilized life requires, in addition to humane personal standards, safeguards built into social systems that uphold compassionate behavior and renounce cruelty.

Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency

This research examined the role of mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Regulatory self-sanctions can be selectively disengaged from detrimental conduct by converting

The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self

Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control

Moral conduct is motivated and regulated mainly by the ongoing exercise of self-reactive influence. But self-regulatory mechanisms do not operate unless they are activated, and there are different

Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict

Results of 2 experiments supported the proposal that empathy-induced altruism can lead one to act in a way that violates the moral principle of justice. In each experiment, participants were asked to

Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility.

The My Lai massacre, Watergate, the Iran-Contra affair: these are examples of the tendency for people to commit illegal acts when so ordered by authority. This book examines these events and the

The psychology of bystanders, perpetrators, and heroic helpers☆

Why Good People Sometimes Do Bad Things: Motivated Reasoning and Unethical Behavior

The hypothesis that unethical behavior is promoted when people are able to develop and maintain a biased characterization of an unethical action as being morally acceptable was tested in an

The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance: A Current Perspective1

...